PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUQA.L vs. IUES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUQA.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUQA.L achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 30.45% return.


IUQA.L

1D
0.80%
1M
3.63%
YTD
8.81%
6M
9.17%
1Y
21.44%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*

IUES.L

1D
-0.36%
1M
3.36%
YTD
30.45%
6M
28.34%
1Y
47.07%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUQA.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUQA.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
8.81%12.50%22.46%30.92%-20.74%27.56%16.09%33.32%-6.99%22.18%
IUES.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
30.45%9.82%3.87%-0.63%63.84%51.95%-33.35%8.81%-18.12%-1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between IUQA.L and IUES.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016

0.41

The correlation between IUQA.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IUQA.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUQA.L
IUES.L

Technology

36.5%

-

Financial Services

11.5%

-

Communication Services

11.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%

-

Healthcare

9.0%

-

Industrials

8.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

4.0%
100.0%

Utilities

1.9%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

IUQA.L
36.5%
IUES.L

-

Financial Services

IUQA.L
11.5%
IUES.L

-

Communication Services

IUQA.L
11.1%
IUES.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IUQA.L
9.4%
IUES.L

-

Healthcare

IUQA.L
9.0%
IUES.L

-

Industrials

IUQA.L
8.2%
IUES.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IUQA.L
4.9%
IUES.L

-

Energy

IUQA.L
4.0%
IUES.L
100.0%

Utilities

IUQA.L
1.9%
IUES.L

-

Real Estate

IUQA.L
1.8%
IUES.L

-

Basic Materials

IUQA.L
1.7%
IUES.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUQA.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUQA.L
IUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IUES.L
IUES.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IUES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IUES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUQA.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUQA.LIUES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.18

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

9.97

+1.72

IUQA.L vs. IUES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUQA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the IUES.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUQA.L and IUES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUQA.LIUES.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.12

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.76

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.31

+0.55

Drawdowns

IUQA.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUQA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -66.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQA.L and IUES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUQA.LIUES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.96%

-66.78%

+32.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.99%

-14.49%

+6.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-20.90%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.77%

-27.98%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.45%

+7.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-14.21%

+9.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

4.63%

-2.77%

Volatility

IUQA.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) is 2.78%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that IUQA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUQA.LIUES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

8.13%

-5.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

18.58%

-10.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

21.81%

-10.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

26.72%

-10.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

28.49%

-11.78%

IUQA.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUQA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IUES.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUQA.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUQA.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUQA.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUES.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUES.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUQA.L.

IUQA.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. IUQA.L tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUQA.L and 0.15% for IUES.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUQA.L and IUES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer