IUQA.L vs. CAPU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L).
IUQA.L and CAPU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUQA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. It was launched on Feb 21, 2018. CAPU.L is a passively managed fund by Natixis that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jun 22, 2015. Both IUQA.L and CAPU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IUQA.L vs. CAPU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IUQA.L vs. CAPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUQA.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -3.10% | 12.50% | 22.46% | 30.92% | -20.74% | 27.56% | 16.09% | 33.32% | -6.99% | 22.18% |
CAPU.L Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust | -2.84% | 9.41% | 15.93% | 28.24% | -15.37% | 28.44% | 17.74% | 31.11% | -4.42% | 19.79% |
Different Trading Currencies
IUQA.L is traded in USD, while CAPU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CAPU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUQA.L achieves a -3.10% return, which is significantly lower than CAPU.L's -2.84% return.
IUQA.L
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -4.74%
- YTD
- -3.10%
- 6M
- -0.31%
- 1Y
- 13.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
CAPU.L
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- -2.84%
- 6M
- -1.57%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.17%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUQA.L vs. CAPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUQA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IUQA.L vs. CAPU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUQA.L
CAPU.L
IUQA.L vs. CAPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUQA.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.39 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 0.63 | +0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.08 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 0.55 | +1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | 2.04 | +4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUQA.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.39 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.62 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.77 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between IUQA.L and CAPU.L is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IUQA.L vs. CAPU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUQA.L nor CAPU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IUQA.L vs. CAPU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUQA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, roughly equal to the maximum CAPU.L drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQA.L and CAPU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUQA.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.96% | -26.39% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.32% | -8.35% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.77% | -15.35% | -12.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.46% | -5.97% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -3.55% | -1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.08% | -0.08% |
Volatility
IUQA.L vs. CAPU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) at 4.00%. This indicates that IUQA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IUQA.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 4.00% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 7.39% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 13.46% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 15.27% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 16.22% | +0.55% |