PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUMO.L vs. XWEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUMO.L vs. XWEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUMO.L achieves a 35.27% return, which is significantly higher than XWEM.L's 21.90% return.


IUMO.L

1D
1.60%
1M
7.88%
YTD
35.27%
6M
33.50%
1Y
44.74%
3Y*
33.31%
5Y*
14.79%
10Y*

XWEM.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.82%
YTD
21.90%
6M
21.23%
1Y
35.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUMO.L vs. XWEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IUMO.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc
35.27%17.16%32.56%10.23%
XWEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C
21.90%21.57%28.83%9.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IUMO.L and XWEM.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023

0.92

The correlation between IUMO.L and XWEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUMO.L vs. XWEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUMO.L
IUMO.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IUMO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

XWEM.L
XWEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XWEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XWEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUMO.L vs. XWEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUMO.LXWEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

3.01

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.70

12.91

+2.79

IUMO.L vs. XWEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the XWEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUMO.L and XWEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUMO.L vs. XWEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMO.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, which is greater than XWEM.L's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMO.L and XWEM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUMO.LXWEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.75%

-19.12%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-11.77%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-2.29%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-2.21%

-5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.75%

+0.09%

Volatility

IUMO.L vs. XWEM.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L) at 5.85%. This indicates that IUMO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XWEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUMO.LXWEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.95%

5.85%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.11%

15.18%

+2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.74%

17.75%

+2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.89%

17.39%

+2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

17.39%

+2.00%

IUMO.L vs. XWEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUMO.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XWEM.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUMO.L vs. XWEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUMO.L nor XWEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, IUMO.L and XWEM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IUMO.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUMO.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XWEM.L.

IUMO.L is categorized as Momentum, while XWEM.L is Global Equities. IUMO.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while XWEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Low Carbon SRI Screened Select. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMO.L and 0.25% for XWEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUMO.L and XWEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer