IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L
IUMO.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc) and XDEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both Momentum funds - IUMO.L tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Index while XDEM.L tracks the MSCI World Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMO.L returned 14.09%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for XDEM.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUMO.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEM.L.
Performance
IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUMO.L is traded in USD, while XDEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUMO.L achieves a 29.52% return, which is significantly higher than XDEM.L's 22.08% return.
IUMO.L
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 12.05%
- YTD
- 29.52%
- 6M
- 29.75%
- 1Y
- 39.37%
- 3Y*
- 32.22%
- 5Y*
- 14.09%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEM.L
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 8.17%
- YTD
- 22.08%
- 6M
- 23.71%
- 1Y
- 33.99%
- 3Y*
- 29.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.93%
IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMO.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc | 29.52% | 17.81% | 31.88% | 9.83% | -18.15% | 12.60% | 29.61% | 28.49% | -3.73% | 37.07% |
XDEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 22.08% | 21.01% | 30.65% | 11.47% | -17.89% | 14.56% | 27.95% | 28.32% | -3.51% | 31.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUMO.L and XDEM.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2016 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IUMO.L and XDEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
Industrials
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
Healthcare
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
Financial Services
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
Communication Services
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
Energy
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
Consumer Defensive
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
Basic Materials
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
Utilities
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
Real Estate
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUMO.L
XDEM.L
IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUMO.L | XDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 2.87 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.44 | 12.16 | +2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUMO.L | XDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.91 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.75 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.82 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUMO.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, which is greater than XDEM.L's maximum drawdown of -30.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMO.L and XDEM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUMO.L | XDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.75% | -30.68% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -11.79% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.01% | -19.41% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.98% | -30.57% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -0.60% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -6.34% | -2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 2.78% | -0.08% |
Volatility
IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) at 6.30%. This indicates that IUMO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUMO.L | XDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.41% | 6.30% | +2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.63% | 15.28% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.28% | 17.68% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 18.17% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.53% | 17.80% | +2.73% |
IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUMO.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEM.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUMO.L nor XDEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IUMO.L and XDEM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IUMO.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUMO.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEM.L.
IUMO.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while XDEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMO.L and 0.25% for XDEM.L.
Find the right allocation for IUMO.L and XDEM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer