PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUMO.L is traded in USD, while XDEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUMO.L achieves a 29.52% return, which is significantly higher than XDEM.L's 22.08% return.


IUMO.L

1D
-1.94%
1M
12.05%
YTD
29.52%
6M
29.75%
1Y
39.37%
3Y*
32.22%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*

XDEM.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
8.17%
YTD
22.08%
6M
23.71%
1Y
33.99%
3Y*
29.56%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
15.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUMO.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc
29.52%17.81%31.88%9.83%-18.15%12.60%29.61%28.49%-3.73%37.07%
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
22.08%21.01%30.65%11.47%-17.89%14.56%27.95%28.32%-3.51%31.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IUMO.L and XDEM.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2016

0.86

The correlation between IUMO.L and XDEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUMO.L
XDEM.L

Technology

42.9%
34.6%

Industrials

19.2%
20.5%

Healthcare

9.6%
6.0%

Financial Services

7.3%
18.9%

Communication Services

6.7%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
1.2%

Energy

2.5%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
1.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
4.9%

Utilities

1.5%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.0%

Technology

IUMO.L
42.9%
XDEM.L
34.6%

Industrials

IUMO.L
19.2%
XDEM.L
20.5%

Healthcare

IUMO.L
9.6%
XDEM.L
6.0%

Financial Services

IUMO.L
7.3%
XDEM.L
18.9%

Communication Services

IUMO.L
6.7%
XDEM.L
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IUMO.L
5.1%
XDEM.L
1.2%

Energy

IUMO.L
2.5%
XDEM.L
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

IUMO.L
2.2%
XDEM.L
1.2%

Basic Materials

IUMO.L
1.9%
XDEM.L
4.9%

Utilities

IUMO.L
1.5%
XDEM.L
2.6%

Real Estate

IUMO.L
1.1%
XDEM.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUMO.L
IUMO.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUMO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEM.L
XDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUMO.LXDEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

2.87

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.44

12.16

+2.28

IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUMO.L and XDEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUMO.LXDEM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.91

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.75

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.82

+0.14

Drawdowns

IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMO.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, which is greater than XDEM.L's maximum drawdown of -30.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMO.L and XDEM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUMO.LXDEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.75%

-30.68%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-11.79%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.01%

-19.41%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.98%

-30.57%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-0.60%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-6.34%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.78%

-0.08%

Volatility

IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) at 6.30%. This indicates that IUMO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUMO.LXDEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

6.30%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.63%

15.28%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.28%

17.68%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

18.17%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.53%

17.80%

+2.73%

IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUMO.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEM.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUMO.L vs. XDEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUMO.L nor XDEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IUMO.L and XDEM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IUMO.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUMO.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEM.L.

IUMO.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while XDEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMO.L and 0.25% for XDEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUMO.L and XDEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer