PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUMF.L vs. JREG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUMF.L vs. JREG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUMF.L is traded in GBp, while JREG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JREG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUMF.L achieves a 29.89% return, which is significantly higher than JREG.L's 9.88% return.


IUMF.L

1D
-1.75%
1M
13.21%
YTD
29.89%
6M
29.09%
1Y
40.90%
3Y*
28.84%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*

JREG.L

1D
0.14%
1M
4.54%
YTD
9.88%
6M
9.92%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUMF.L vs. JREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUMF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
29.89%9.14%34.88%3.73%-8.43%14.11%25.03%23.31%-7.26%
JREG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
9.88%11.22%20.75%19.41%-7.92%25.50%13.77%23.08%-6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IUMF.L and JREG.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.74

The correlation between IUMF.L and JREG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUMF.L vs. JREG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUMF.L
JREG.L

Technology

42.9%
28.6%

Industrials

19.2%
11.3%

Healthcare

9.6%
8.9%

Financial Services

7.3%
15.4%

Communication Services

6.7%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
10.1%

Energy

2.5%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
4.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
3.2%

Utilities

1.5%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.7%

Technology

IUMF.L
42.9%
JREG.L
28.6%

Industrials

IUMF.L
19.2%
JREG.L
11.3%

Healthcare

IUMF.L
9.6%
JREG.L
8.9%

Financial Services

IUMF.L
7.3%
JREG.L
15.4%

Communication Services

IUMF.L
6.7%
JREG.L
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IUMF.L
5.1%
JREG.L
10.1%

Energy

IUMF.L
2.5%
JREG.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

IUMF.L
2.2%
JREG.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

IUMF.L
1.9%
JREG.L
3.2%

Utilities

IUMF.L
1.5%
JREG.L
2.9%

Real Estate

IUMF.L
1.1%
JREG.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUMF.L vs. JREG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUMF.L
IUMF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IUMF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

JREG.L
JREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUMF.L vs. JREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUMF.LJREG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

4.05

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.10

15.89

-1.79

IUMF.L vs. JREG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the JREG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUMF.L and JREG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUMF.LJREG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.28

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.92

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.86

-0.01

Drawdowns

IUMF.L vs. JREG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, roughly equal to the maximum JREG.L drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMF.L and JREG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUMF.LJREG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.23%

-25.88%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-6.51%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-18.75%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.37%

-18.75%

-5.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-0.18%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-3.17%

-3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

1.66%

+1.23%

Volatility

IUMF.L vs. JREG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) at 3.26%. This indicates that IUMF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUMF.LJREG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

3.26%

+4.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.09%

8.75%

+6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.99%

11.57%

+6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

14.39%

+3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

16.18%

+2.48%

IUMF.L vs. JREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUMF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JREG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUMF.L vs. JREG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUMF.L nor JREG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUMF.L and JREG.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUMF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUMF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JREG.L.

IUMF.L is categorized as Momentum, while JREG.L is Global Equities. IUMF.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while JREG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMF.L and 0.25% for JREG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUMF.L and JREG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer