IUMF.L vs. IITU.L
IUMF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IUMF.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMF.L returned 15.74%/yr vs 26.03%/yr for IITU.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUMF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
IUMF.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUMF.L achieves a 32.21% return, which is significantly higher than IITU.L's 25.87% return.
IUMF.L
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 18.47%
- YTD
- 32.21%
- 6M
- 32.62%
- 1Y
- 43.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.74%
- 10Y*
- —
IITU.L
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 18.53%
- YTD
- 25.87%
- 6M
- 24.64%
- 1Y
- 56.89%
- 3Y*
- 32.15%
- 5Y*
- 26.03%
- 10Y*
- 27.67%
IUMF.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF | 32.21% | 9.14% | 34.88% | 3.73% | -8.43% | 14.11% | 25.03% | 23.31% | 2.39% | 24.77% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 25.87% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUMF.L and IITU.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IUMF.L and IITU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUMF.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUMF.L
IITU.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
IUMF.L
IITU.L
Industrials
IUMF.L
IITU.L
Healthcare
IUMF.L
IITU.L
-
Financial Services
IUMF.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
IUMF.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IUMF.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
IUMF.L
IITU.L
Consumer Defensive
IUMF.L
IITU.L
-
Basic Materials
IUMF.L
IITU.L
-
Utilities
IUMF.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
IUMF.L
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUMF.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUMF.L
IITU.L
IUMF.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUMF.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.48 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.66 | 3.38 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.06 | 8.71 | +6.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUMF.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.91 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 1.19 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.24 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
IUMF.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUMF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMF.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUMF.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.23% | -28.03% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -16.76% | +7.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -28.03% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.37% | -28.03% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.83% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -5.14% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 6.51% | -3.62% |
Volatility
IUMF.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) at 6.45%. This indicates that IUMF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUMF.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 6.45% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 14.27% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.90% | 19.57% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 21.93% | -3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 21.31% | -2.66% |
IUMF.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUMF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUMF.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUMF.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUMF.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUMF.L.
IUMF.L is categorized as Momentum, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. IUMF.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMF.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for IUMF.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer