PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUMF.L achieves a 32.21% return, which is significantly higher than EQQQ.L's 20.61% return.


IUMF.L

1D
1.91%
1M
18.47%
YTD
32.21%
6M
32.62%
1Y
43.66%
3Y*
29.81%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*

EQQQ.L

1D
0.19%
1M
11.85%
YTD
20.61%
6M
18.88%
1Y
42.65%
3Y*
25.32%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
22.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUMF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
32.21%9.14%34.88%3.73%-8.43%14.11%25.03%23.31%2.39%24.77%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
20.61%11.54%28.55%47.79%-25.54%29.59%43.32%33.69%4.64%20.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IUMF.L and EQQQ.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016

0.82

The correlation between IUMF.L and EQQQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (5 years) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L

Technology

42.9%
57.9%

Industrials

19.2%
2.8%

Healthcare

9.6%
3.7%

Financial Services

7.3%
0.2%

Communication Services

6.7%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
11.6%

Energy

2.5%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
6.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.0%

Utilities

1.5%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.0%

Technology

IUMF.L
42.9%
EQQQ.L
57.9%

Industrials

IUMF.L
19.2%
EQQQ.L
2.8%

Healthcare

IUMF.L
9.6%
EQQQ.L
3.7%

Financial Services

IUMF.L
7.3%
EQQQ.L
0.2%

Communication Services

IUMF.L
6.7%
EQQQ.L
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IUMF.L
5.1%
EQQQ.L
11.6%

Energy

IUMF.L
2.5%
EQQQ.L
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

IUMF.L
2.2%
EQQQ.L
6.6%

Basic Materials

IUMF.L
1.9%
EQQQ.L
1.0%

Utilities

IUMF.L
1.5%
EQQQ.L
1.2%

Real Estate

IUMF.L
1.1%
EQQQ.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUMF.L
IUMF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IUMF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUMF.LEQQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.51

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.66

3.87

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.06

11.41

+3.65

IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUMF.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUMF.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.89

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.99

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.92

-0.06

Drawdowns

IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMF.L and EQQQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUMF.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.23%

-33.75%

+8.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-10.97%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-24.09%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.37%

-27.76%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-5.61%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.73%

-0.84%

Volatility

IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.09%. This indicates that IUMF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUMF.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.74%

4.09%

+3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

10.30%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.90%

14.76%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

19.14%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

19.35%

-0.70%

IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUMF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

IUMF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
IUMF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUMF.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUMF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUMF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

IUMF.L is categorized as Momentum, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. IUMF.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMF.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUMF.L and EQQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer