IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L
IUMF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUMF.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMF.L returned 15.74%/yr vs 19.02%/yr for EQQQ.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUMF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.L.
Performance
IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUMF.L achieves a 32.21% return, which is significantly higher than EQQQ.L's 20.61% return.
IUMF.L
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 18.47%
- YTD
- 32.21%
- 6M
- 32.62%
- 1Y
- 43.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.74%
- 10Y*
- —
EQQQ.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 11.85%
- YTD
- 20.61%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- 42.65%
- 3Y*
- 25.32%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 22.67%
IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF | 32.21% | 9.14% | 34.88% | 3.73% | -8.43% | 14.11% | 25.03% | 23.31% | 2.39% | 24.77% |
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 20.61% | 11.54% | 28.55% | 47.79% | -25.54% | 29.59% | 43.32% | 33.69% | 4.64% | 20.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUMF.L and EQQQ.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IUMF.L and EQQQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (5 years) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
Industrials
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
Healthcare
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
Financial Services
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
Communication Services
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
Energy
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
Consumer Defensive
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
Basic Materials
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
Utilities
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
Real Estate
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUMF.L
EQQQ.L
IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUMF.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.51 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.66 | 3.87 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.06 | 11.41 | +3.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUMF.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.89 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.99 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.92 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUMF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMF.L and EQQQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUMF.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.23% | -33.75% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -10.97% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -24.09% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.37% | -27.76% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -5.61% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.73% | -0.84% |
Volatility
IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.09%. This indicates that IUMF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUMF.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 4.09% | +3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 10.30% | +4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.90% | 14.76% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 19.14% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 19.35% | -0.70% |
IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUMF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUMF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
IUMF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.72% |
IUMF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUMF.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUMF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUMF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.L.
IUMF.L is categorized as Momentum, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. IUMF.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMF.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.
Find the right allocation for IUMF.L and EQQQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer