PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUMD.L vs. SGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUMD.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUMD.L is traded in USD, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUMD.L achieves a 29.46% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's 3.64% return.


IUMD.L

1D
-1.92%
1M
11.97%
YTD
29.46%
6M
29.72%
1Y
39.40%
3Y*
32.20%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*

SGLN.L

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
3.64%
6M
6.20%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
31.47%
5Y*
18.86%
10Y*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUMD.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUMD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
29.46%17.13%32.70%9.78%-18.13%12.60%29.52%27.26%-8.17%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
3.64%65.25%26.06%12.89%-0.12%-3.46%23.28%19.23%-3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between IUMD.L and SGLN.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2018

0.06

The correlation between IUMD.L and SGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUMD.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUMD.L
IUMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IUMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IUMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SGLN.L
SGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUMD.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUMD.LSGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.25

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

1.85

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.47

4.74

+9.72

IUMD.L vs. SGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUMD.L and SGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUMD.LSGLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.33

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

1.08

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.46

+0.25

Drawdowns

IUMD.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMD.L and SGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUMD.LSGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-45.21%

+11.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-17.50%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.57%

-17.50%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.87%

-21.27%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-15.90%

+13.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-19.80%

+11.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

6.83%

-4.12%

Volatility

IUMD.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) at 5.74%. This indicates that IUMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUMD.LSGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.70%

5.74%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.78%

21.04%

-4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

24.26%

-4.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.62%

17.52%

+2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

15.86%

+4.61%

IUMD.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUMD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUMD.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

IUMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IUMD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.67%0.87%0.50%1.14%1.41%0.40%0.67%1.13%0.85%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUMD.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUMD.L.

IUMD.L is categorized as Momentum, while SGLN.L is Gold. IUMD.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMD.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUMD.L and SGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer