IUMD.L vs. EQQU.L
IUMD.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and EQQU.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUMD.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while EQQU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMD.L returned 14.09%/yr vs 17.59%/yr for EQQU.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUMD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQU.L.
Performance
IUMD.L vs. EQQU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUMD.L achieves a 29.46% return, which is significantly higher than EQQU.L's 19.55% return.
IUMD.L
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- 11.97%
- YTD
- 29.46%
- 6M
- 29.72%
- 1Y
- 39.40%
- 3Y*
- 32.20%
- 5Y*
- 14.09%
- 10Y*
- —
EQQU.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 19.04%
- 1Y
- 40.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.98%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 21.19%
IUMD.L vs. EQQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMD.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 29.46% | 17.13% | 32.70% | 9.78% | -18.13% | 12.60% | 29.52% | 27.26% | -8.17% |
EQQU.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 19.55% | 19.75% | 26.54% | 56.27% | -33.46% | 27.95% | 47.76% | 37.17% | -7.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUMD.L and EQQU.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IUMD.L and EQQU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUMD.L vs. EQQU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
Industrials
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
Healthcare
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
Financial Services
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
Communication Services
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
Energy
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
Consumer Defensive
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
Basic Materials
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
Utilities
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
Real Estate
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUMD.L vs. EQQU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUMD.L
EQQU.L
IUMD.L vs. EQQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUMD.L | EQQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 3.64 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.47 | 13.04 | +1.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUMD.L | EQQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.52 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.85 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.95 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
IUMD.L vs. EQQU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUMD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, roughly equal to the maximum EQQU.L drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMD.L and EQQU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUMD.L | EQQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.67% | -35.17% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.63% | -11.00% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.57% | -22.30% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.87% | -35.17% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -0.77% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.75% | -6.10% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 3.08% | -0.37% |
Volatility
IUMD.L vs. EQQU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) at 4.93%. This indicates that IUMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUMD.L | EQQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | 4.93% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.78% | 11.88% | +4.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.45% | 15.88% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 20.76% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 19.97% | +0.50% |
IUMD.L vs. EQQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUMD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUMD.L vs. EQQU.L - Dividend Comparison
IUMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than EQQU.L's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQU.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.26% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUMD.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.67% | 0.87% | 0.50% | 1.14% | 1.41% | 0.40% | 0.67% | 1.13% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUMD.L and EQQU.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUMD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUMD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQU.L.
IUMD.L is categorized as Momentum, while EQQU.L is Nasdaq-100. IUMD.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while EQQU.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMD.L and 0.30% for EQQU.L.
Find the right allocation for IUMD.L and EQQU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer