PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUKP.L vs. XRES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUKP.L vs. XRES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares UK Property UCITS ETF (IUKP.L) and Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XRES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUKP.L is traded in GBp, while XRES.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XRES.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUKP.L achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly lower than XRES.L's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IUKP.L has underperformed XRES.L with an annualized return of -4.20%, while XRES.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.18% annualized return.


IUKP.L

1D
0.96%
1M
1.62%
YTD
-3.75%
6M
-2.64%
1Y
-4.48%
3Y*
-3.49%
5Y*
-7.61%
10Y*
-4.20%

XRES.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.64%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.07%
1Y
10.43%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUKP.L vs. XRES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUKP.L
iShares UK Property UCITS ETF
-3.75%4.80%-15.54%6.20%-33.79%25.56%-18.46%25.37%-16.13%8.55%
XRES.L
Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
9.49%-3.42%4.23%7.08%-17.17%48.30%-6.29%22.26%2.79%1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IUKP.L and XRES.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2016

0.40

IUKP.L vs. XRES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUKP.L
XRES.L

Real Estate

99.3%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

IUKP.L
99.3%
XRES.L
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IUKP.L
0.7%
XRES.L

-

Basic Materials

IUKP.L

-

XRES.L

-

Communication Services

IUKP.L

-

XRES.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IUKP.L

-

XRES.L

-

Energy

IUKP.L

-

XRES.L

-

Financial Services

IUKP.L

-

XRES.L

-

Healthcare

IUKP.L

-

XRES.L

-

Industrials

IUKP.L

-

XRES.L

-

Technology

IUKP.L

-

XRES.L

-

Utilities

IUKP.L

-

XRES.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUKP.L vs. XRES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUKP.L
IUKP.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IUKP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUKP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUKP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IUKP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUKP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

XRES.L
XRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUKP.L vs. XRES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares UK Property UCITS ETF (IUKP.L) and Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XRES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUKP.LXRES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.14

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

1.55

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.58

3.28

-3.86

IUKP.L vs. XRES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUKP.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the XRES.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUKP.L and XRES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUKP.LXRES.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

0.76

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

0.22

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.20

0.38

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

0.43

-0.61

Drawdowns

IUKP.L vs. XRES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUKP.L drawdown since its inception was -81.01%, which is greater than XRES.L's maximum drawdown of -30.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUKP.L and XRES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUKP.LXRES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.01%

-30.14%

-50.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.67%

-6.70%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.37%

-18.86%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.63%

-29.31%

-16.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.63%

-30.14%

-15.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.46%

-4.98%

-56.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.12%

-9.27%

-41.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.72%

3.17%

+4.55%

Volatility

IUKP.L vs. XRES.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares UK Property UCITS ETF (IUKP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XRES.L) at 4.35%. This indicates that IUKP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUKP.LXRES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

4.35%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.21%

10.43%

+4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.88%

13.72%

+5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

17.58%

+3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

18.89%

+1.95%

IUKP.L vs. XRES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUKP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XRES.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUKP.L vs. XRES.L - Dividend Comparison

IUKP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while XRES.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUKP.L
iShares UK Property UCITS ETF
0.04%0.04%0.05%0.04%0.04%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.04%0.03%0.03%0.02%
XRES.L
Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUKP.L and XRES.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRES.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRES.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IUKP.L.

IUKP.L tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT United Kingdom, while XRES.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IUKP.L and 0.14% for XRES.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUKP.L and XRES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer