IUIS.L vs. XS2D.L
IUIS.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XS2D.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IUIS.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while XS2D.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUIS.L returned 13.16%/yr vs 18.77%/yr for XS2D.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUIS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XS2D.L.
Performance
IUIS.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUIS.L achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly lower than XS2D.L's 17.62% return.
IUIS.L
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- —
XS2D.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 17.03%
- YTD
- 17.62%
- 1Y
- 39.21%
- 3Y*
- 33.50%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 23.61%
IUIS.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUIS.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 15.25% | 19.17% | 17.53% | 17.86% | -5.28% | 20.71% | 9.96% | 28.50% | -12.85% | 14.96% |
XS2D.L Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 17.62% | 26.58% | 45.65% | 48.87% | -39.09% | 63.03% | 20.96% | 62.86% | -15.93% | 31.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUIS.L and XS2D.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2017 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IUIS.L and XS2D.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUIS.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUIS.L
XS2D.L
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
IUIS.L
XS2D.L
Utilities
IUIS.L
XS2D.L
Technology
IUIS.L
XS2D.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUIS.L
XS2D.L
Basic Materials
IUIS.L
XS2D.L
Communication Services
IUIS.L
-
XS2D.L
Consumer Defensive
IUIS.L
-
XS2D.L
Energy
IUIS.L
-
XS2D.L
-
Financial Services
IUIS.L
-
XS2D.L
Healthcare
IUIS.L
-
XS2D.L
Real Estate
IUIS.L
-
XS2D.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUIS.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUIS.L
XS2D.L
IUIS.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUIS.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.31 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.38 | 9.10 | -1.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUIS.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUIS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, smaller than the maximum XS2D.L drawdown of -59.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUIS.L and XS2D.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUIS.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.18% | -59.31% | +17.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -16.91% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.63% | -34.83% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.22% | -46.01% | +24.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -1.97% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -8.93% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 4.30% | -1.55% |
Volatility
IUIS.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) is 4.85%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that IUIS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS2D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUIS.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 5.61% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 18.52% | -5.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 24.27% | -9.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 31.89% | -14.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 32.34% | -12.85% |
IUIS.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUIS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUIS.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUIS.L nor XS2D.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUIS.L and XS2D.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XS2D.L.
IUIS.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XS2D.L is Leveraged Equities. IUIS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUIS.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.
Find the right allocation for IUIS.L and XS2D.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer