PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) and Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUIS.L is traded in USD, while XLIP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLIP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IUIS.L having a 12.57% return and XLIP.L slightly lower at 12.46%.


IUIS.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.82%
YTD
12.57%
6M
13.85%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*

XLIP.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.72%
YTD
12.46%
6M
13.90%
1Y
23.16%
3Y*
21.84%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUIS.L
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.57%19.24%17.42%17.93%-5.28%20.71%9.96%28.50%-14.17%16.92%
XLIP.L
Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
12.46%19.50%17.29%17.44%-5.22%20.97%9.42%29.83%-14.53%16.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IUIS.L and XLIP.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017

0.94

The correlation between IUIS.L and XLIP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUIS.L
XLIP.L

Industrials

90.1%
96.3%

Utilities

5.3%

-

Technology

3.7%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
1.3%

Basic Materials

0.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Industrials

IUIS.L
90.1%
XLIP.L
96.3%

Utilities

IUIS.L
5.3%
XLIP.L

-

Technology

IUIS.L
3.7%
XLIP.L
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IUIS.L
0.5%
XLIP.L
1.3%

Basic Materials

IUIS.L
0.2%
XLIP.L

-

Communication Services

IUIS.L

-

XLIP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IUIS.L

-

XLIP.L

-

Energy

IUIS.L

-

XLIP.L

-

Financial Services

IUIS.L

-

XLIP.L

-

Healthcare

IUIS.L

-

XLIP.L

-

Real Estate

IUIS.L

-

XLIP.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUIS.L
IUIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IUIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XLIP.L
XLIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XLIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) and Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUIS.LXLIP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.12

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

8.34

+0.19

IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUIS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the XLIP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUIS.L and XLIP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUIS.LXLIP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

1.65

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.72

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.62

+0.03

Drawdowns

IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUIS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, roughly equal to the maximum XLIP.L drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUIS.L and XLIP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUIS.LXLIP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.18%

-41.72%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-10.85%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-19.78%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.22%

-21.91%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-1.23%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-4.81%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.77%

-0.07%

Volatility

IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) at 4.55%. This indicates that IUIS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUIS.LXLIP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

4.55%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

11.15%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

13.96%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

17.01%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

19.06%

+0.56%

IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUIS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLIP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUIS.L nor XLIP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IUIS.L and XLIP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLIP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLIP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUIS.L.

IUIS.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XLIP.L is Industrials Equities. IUIS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while XLIP.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUIS.L and 0.14% for XLIP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUIS.L and XLIP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer