IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L
IUIS.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XLIP.L (Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUIS.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while XLIP.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUIS.L returned 12.20%/yr vs 12.21%/yr for XLIP.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUIS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLIP.L.
Performance
IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUIS.L is traded in USD, while XLIP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLIP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IUIS.L having a 12.57% return and XLIP.L slightly lower at 12.46%.
IUIS.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- 1Y
- 23.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- —
XLIP.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 12.46%
- 6M
- 13.90%
- 1Y
- 23.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUIS.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.57% | 19.24% | 17.42% | 17.93% | -5.28% | 20.71% | 9.96% | 28.50% | -14.17% | 16.92% |
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 12.46% | 19.50% | 17.29% | 17.44% | -5.22% | 20.97% | 9.42% | 29.83% | -14.53% | 16.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUIS.L and XLIP.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.94 |
The correlation between IUIS.L and XLIP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUIS.L
XLIP.L
Industrials
Utilities
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
IUIS.L
XLIP.L
Utilities
IUIS.L
XLIP.L
-
Technology
IUIS.L
XLIP.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUIS.L
XLIP.L
Basic Materials
IUIS.L
XLIP.L
-
Communication Services
IUIS.L
-
XLIP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IUIS.L
-
XLIP.L
-
Energy
IUIS.L
-
XLIP.L
-
Financial Services
IUIS.L
-
XLIP.L
-
Healthcare
IUIS.L
-
XLIP.L
-
Real Estate
IUIS.L
-
XLIP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUIS.L
XLIP.L
IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) and Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUIS.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.12 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 8.34 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUIS.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.65 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.72 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.62 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUIS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, roughly equal to the maximum XLIP.L drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUIS.L and XLIP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUIS.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.18% | -41.72% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -10.85% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.59% | -19.78% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.22% | -21.91% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -1.23% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -4.81% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 2.77% | -0.07% |
Volatility
IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) at 4.55%. This indicates that IUIS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUIS.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 4.55% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 11.15% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 13.96% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 17.01% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 19.06% | +0.56% |
IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUIS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLIP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUIS.L vs. XLIP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUIS.L nor XLIP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IUIS.L and XLIP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLIP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLIP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUIS.L.
IUIS.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XLIP.L is Industrials Equities. IUIS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while XLIP.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUIS.L and 0.14% for XLIP.L.
Find the right allocation for IUIS.L and XLIP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer