IUIS.L vs. PQVM.L
IUIS.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and PQVM.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - IUIS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index while PQVM.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUIS.L returned 12.20%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for PQVM.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUIS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVM.L.
Performance
IUIS.L vs. PQVM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUIS.L achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly lower than PQVM.L's 16.65% return.
IUIS.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- 1Y
- 23.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- —
PQVM.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 17.79%
- 1Y
- 22.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.37%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- —
IUIS.L vs. PQVM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUIS.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.57% | 19.24% | 17.42% | 17.93% | -5.28% | 20.71% | 9.96% | 28.50% | -14.17% | 13.42% |
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 16.65% | 13.66% | 30.17% | 6.82% | 0.52% | 26.13% | 8.05% | 25.07% | -6.99% | 18.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUIS.L and PQVM.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IUIS.L and PQVM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUIS.L vs. PQVM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUIS.L
PQVM.L
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
IUIS.L
PQVM.L
Utilities
IUIS.L
PQVM.L
Technology
IUIS.L
PQVM.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUIS.L
PQVM.L
Basic Materials
IUIS.L
PQVM.L
Communication Services
IUIS.L
-
PQVM.L
Consumer Defensive
IUIS.L
-
PQVM.L
Energy
IUIS.L
-
PQVM.L
Financial Services
IUIS.L
-
PQVM.L
Healthcare
IUIS.L
-
PQVM.L
Real Estate
IUIS.L
-
PQVM.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUIS.L vs. PQVM.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUIS.L
PQVM.L
IUIS.L vs. PQVM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUIS.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.37 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 4.70 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 16.26 | -7.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUIS.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.06 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.96 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.87 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
IUIS.L vs. PQVM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUIS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, which is greater than PQVM.L's maximum drawdown of -34.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUIS.L and PQVM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUIS.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.18% | -34.42% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -4.83% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.59% | -15.49% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.22% | -17.35% | -3.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | 0.00% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -3.90% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 1.40% | +1.30% |
Volatility
IUIS.L vs. PQVM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) at 3.15%. This indicates that IUIS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQVM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUIS.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 3.15% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 8.76% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 11.01% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 16.13% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 17.13% | +2.49% |
IUIS.L vs. PQVM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUIS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVM.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUIS.L vs. PQVM.L - Dividend Comparison
IUIS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUIS.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.77% | 0.82% | 0.84% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 0.89% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUIS.L and PQVM.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVM.L.
IUIS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUIS.L and 0.35% for PQVM.L.
Find the right allocation for IUIS.L and PQVM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer