IUIS.L vs. I500.L
IUIS.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and I500.L (iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from iShares - IUIS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index while I500.L tracks the S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUIS.L returned 12.20%/yr vs 13.94%/yr for I500.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUIS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for I500.L.
Performance
IUIS.L vs. I500.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUIS.L is traded in USD, while I500.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the I500.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUIS.L achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than I500.L's 10.34% return.
IUIS.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- 1Y
- 23.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- —
I500.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 28.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.94%
- 10Y*
- —
IUIS.L vs. I500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUIS.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.57% | 19.24% | 17.42% | 17.93% | -5.28% | 20.71% | 14.23% |
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF | 10.34% | 17.82% | 25.44% | 26.37% | -18.49% | 30.04% | 12.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUIS.L and I500.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IUIS.L and I500.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUIS.L vs. I500.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUIS.L
I500.L
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
IUIS.L
I500.L
Utilities
IUIS.L
I500.L
Technology
IUIS.L
I500.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUIS.L
I500.L
Basic Materials
IUIS.L
I500.L
Communication Services
IUIS.L
-
I500.L
Consumer Defensive
IUIS.L
-
I500.L
Energy
IUIS.L
-
I500.L
Financial Services
IUIS.L
-
I500.L
Healthcare
IUIS.L
-
I500.L
Real Estate
IUIS.L
-
I500.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUIS.L vs. I500.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUIS.L
I500.L
IUIS.L vs. I500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUIS.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.46 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 3.23 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 13.99 | -5.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUIS.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.55 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.90 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.10 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
IUIS.L vs. I500.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUIS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, which is greater than I500.L's maximum drawdown of -25.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUIS.L and I500.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUIS.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.18% | -25.00% | -17.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -8.66% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.59% | -18.47% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.22% | -25.00% | +3.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -0.55% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -5.01% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 2.00% | +0.70% |
Volatility
IUIS.L vs. I500.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) at 2.57%. This indicates that IUIS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than I500.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUIS.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 2.57% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 7.89% | +4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 10.98% | +3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 15.51% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 15.51% | +4.11% |
IUIS.L vs. I500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUIS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than I500.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUIS.L vs. I500.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUIS.L nor I500.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUIS.L and I500.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, I500.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
I500.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUIS.L.
IUIS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while I500.L tracks S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUIS.L and 0.07% for I500.L.
Find the right allocation for IUIS.L and I500.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer