PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUIS.L vs. BRIP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUIS.L vs. BRIP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) and Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUIS.L is traded in USD, while BRIP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BRIP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUIS.L achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than BRIP.L's 6.13% return.


IUIS.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.82%
YTD
12.57%
6M
13.85%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*

BRIP.L

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
6.13%
6M
8.28%
1Y
10.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUIS.L vs. BRIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IUIS.L and BRIP.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.47

The correlation between IUIS.L and BRIP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUIS.L vs. BRIP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUIS.L
IUIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IUIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

BRIP.L
BRIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BRIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BRIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUIS.L vs. BRIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) and Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUIS.LBRIP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.13

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

0.95

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

2.79

+5.74

IUIS.L vs. BRIP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUIS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the BRIP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUIS.L and BRIP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUIS.LBRIP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

0.64

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

1.17

-0.52

Drawdowns

IUIS.L vs. BRIP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUIS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, which is greater than BRIP.L's maximum drawdown of -14.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUIS.L and BRIP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUIS.LBRIP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.18%

-14.25%

-27.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-11.46%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-6.38%

+5.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-3.69%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.89%

-1.19%

Volatility

IUIS.L vs. BRIP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) is 4.96%, while Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that IUIS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUIS.LBRIP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

6.05%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

13.86%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

16.82%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

17.90%

-0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

17.90%

+1.72%

IUIS.L vs. BRIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUIS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BRIP.L's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUIS.L vs. BRIP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUIS.L nor BRIP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUIS.L and BRIP.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUIS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUIS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BRIP.L.

IUIS.L is categorized as S&P 500, while BRIP.L is Industrials Equities. IUIS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while BRIP.L tracks Mirae Asset European Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUIS.L and 0.47% for BRIP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUIS.L and BRIP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer