PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUHC.L vs. WHEA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUHC.L vs. WHEA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUHC.L achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly higher than WHEA.L's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, IUHC.L has outperformed WHEA.L with an annualized return of 9.45%, while WHEA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.


IUHC.L

1D
0.47%
1M
4.22%
6M
1.83%
YTD
2.89%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
9.45%

WHEA.L

1D
0.44%
1M
3.82%
6M
-0.33%
YTD
1.40%
1Y
17.80%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUHC.L vs. WHEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUHC.L
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.89%14.72%2.16%1.72%-2.63%27.58%11.93%20.55%4.52%22.16%
WHEA.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF
1.40%15.24%1.05%3.54%-5.55%20.41%12.93%23.18%1.48%20.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IUHC.L and WHEA.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.93

The correlation between IUHC.L and WHEA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUHC.L vs. WHEA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUHC.L
IUHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

WHEA.L
WHEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
WHEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
WHEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUHC.L vs. WHEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUHC.LWHEA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.63

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.06

3.96

+1.10

IUHC.L vs. WHEA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the WHEA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUHC.L and WHEA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUHC.L vs. WHEA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, roughly equal to the maximum WHEA.L drawdown of -26.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and WHEA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUHC.LWHEA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-26.20%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-10.35%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-19.16%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.62%

-19.16%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.44%

-26.20%

-1.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.39%

-3.30%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-4.76%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

4.27%

-0.06%

Volatility

IUHC.L vs. WHEA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.L) have volatilities of 5.97% and 5.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUHC.LWHEA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

5.90%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.61%

11.52%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.58%

15.11%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

14.27%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

14.73%

+1.04%

IUHC.L vs. WHEA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUHC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WHEA.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUHC.L vs. WHEA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUHC.L nor WHEA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IUHC.L and WHEA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IUHC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUHC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WHEA.L.

IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while WHEA.L tracks State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUHC.L and 0.30% for WHEA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUHC.L and WHEA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer