PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUHC.L achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly lower than VUAA.L's 10.32% return.


IUHC.L

1D
3.00%
1M
4.72%
YTD
-2.09%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
9.20%

VUAA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.49%
YTD
10.32%
6M
11.14%
1Y
27.80%
3Y*
22.16%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IUHC.L
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-2.09%14.67%2.16%1.72%-2.63%27.58%11.93%16.04%
VUAA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
10.32%17.37%25.27%26.68%-18.63%29.34%17.66%12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IUHC.L and VUAA.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between IUHC.L and VUAA.L has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUHC.L
VUAA.L

Healthcare

100.0%
8.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Healthcare

IUHC.L
100.0%
VUAA.L
8.5%

Basic Materials

IUHC.L

-

VUAA.L
1.8%

Communication Services

IUHC.L

-

VUAA.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IUHC.L

-

VUAA.L
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

IUHC.L

-

VUAA.L
4.9%

Energy

IUHC.L

-

VUAA.L
3.5%

Financial Services

IUHC.L

-

VUAA.L
11.6%

Industrials

IUHC.L

-

VUAA.L
8.3%

Real Estate

IUHC.L

-

VUAA.L
1.9%

Technology

IUHC.L

-

VUAA.L
35.7%

Utilities

IUHC.L

-

VUAA.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUHC.L
IUHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VUAA.L
VUAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUHC.LVUAA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.43

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.39

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.57

14.52

-10.95

IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUHC.L and VUAA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUHC.LVUAA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

2.37

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.86

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.91

-0.34

Drawdowns

IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum VUAA.L drawdown of -34.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and VUAA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUHC.LVUAA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-34.05%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.44%

-8.18%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.63%

-18.39%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.63%

-24.36%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.57%

-0.54%

-4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-5.09%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

1.91%

+2.29%

Volatility

IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) at 3.18%. This indicates that IUHC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUHC.LVUAA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

3.18%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

8.57%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

11.69%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.82%

16.00%

-1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

17.78%

-2.07%

IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUHC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUHC.L nor VUAA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUHC.L and VUAA.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUHC.L.

IUHC.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VUAA.L is S&P 500. IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUHC.L and 0.07% for VUAA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUHC.L and VUAA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer