IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L
IUHC.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - IUHC.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while VUAA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUHC.L returned 5.75%/yr vs 13.71%/yr for VUAA.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUHC.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUAA.L.
Performance
IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUHC.L achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly lower than VUAA.L's 10.32% return.
IUHC.L
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
VUAA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 27.80%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- —
IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -2.09% | 14.67% | 2.16% | 1.72% | -2.63% | 27.58% | 11.93% | 16.04% |
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 10.32% | 17.37% | 25.27% | 26.68% | -18.63% | 29.34% | 17.66% | 12.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUHC.L and VUAA.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IUHC.L and VUAA.L has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUHC.L
VUAA.L
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
IUHC.L
VUAA.L
Basic Materials
IUHC.L
-
VUAA.L
Communication Services
IUHC.L
-
VUAA.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUHC.L
-
VUAA.L
Consumer Defensive
IUHC.L
-
VUAA.L
Energy
IUHC.L
-
VUAA.L
Financial Services
IUHC.L
-
VUAA.L
Industrials
IUHC.L
-
VUAA.L
Real Estate
IUHC.L
-
VUAA.L
Technology
IUHC.L
-
VUAA.L
Utilities
IUHC.L
-
VUAA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUHC.L
VUAA.L
IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUHC.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 3.39 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 14.52 | -10.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUHC.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 2.37 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.86 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.91 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum VUAA.L drawdown of -34.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and VUAA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUHC.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -34.05% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.44% | -8.18% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.63% | -18.39% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.63% | -24.36% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.57% | -0.54% | -4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -5.09% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 1.91% | +2.29% |
Volatility
IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) at 3.18%. This indicates that IUHC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUHC.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 3.18% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 8.57% | +2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 11.69% | +3.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.82% | 16.00% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 17.78% | -2.07% |
IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUHC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUHC.L vs. VUAA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUHC.L nor VUAA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUHC.L and VUAA.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUHC.L.
IUHC.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VUAA.L is S&P 500. IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUHC.L and 0.07% for VUAA.L.
Find the right allocation for IUHC.L and VUAA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer