PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUHC.L is traded in USD, while MEUD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MEUD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUHC.L achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than MEUD.L's 7.32% return. Over the past 10 years, IUHC.L has underperformed MEUD.L with an annualized return of 9.60%, while MEUD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.43% annualized return.


IUHC.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
5.46%
YTD
-0.88%
6M
0.57%
1Y
14.44%
3Y*
6.86%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
9.60%

MEUD.L

1D
1.59%
1M
2.70%
YTD
7.32%
6M
9.74%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
10.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUHC.L
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.88%14.72%2.16%1.72%-2.63%27.58%11.93%20.55%4.52%22.16%
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
7.32%36.05%1.93%19.47%-15.19%16.00%7.03%25.23%-14.71%26.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IUHC.L and MEUD.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.52

The correlation between IUHC.L and MEUD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUHC.L
MEUD.L

Healthcare

100.0%
12.6%

Basic Materials

-

5.1%

Communication Services

-

3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

5.3%

Financial Services

-

23.9%

Industrials

-

20.3%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

-

9.4%

Utilities

-

4.4%

Healthcare

IUHC.L
100.0%
MEUD.L
12.6%

Basic Materials

IUHC.L

-

MEUD.L
5.1%

Communication Services

IUHC.L

-

MEUD.L
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IUHC.L

-

MEUD.L
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

IUHC.L

-

MEUD.L
7.7%

Energy

IUHC.L

-

MEUD.L
5.3%

Financial Services

IUHC.L

-

MEUD.L
23.9%

Industrials

IUHC.L

-

MEUD.L
20.3%

Real Estate

IUHC.L

-

MEUD.L
1.2%

Technology

IUHC.L

-

MEUD.L
9.4%

Utilities

IUHC.L

-

MEUD.L
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUHC.L
IUHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

MEUD.L
MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUHC.LMEUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.54

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

5.48

-2.06

IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUHC.L and MEUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum MEUD.L drawdown of -36.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and MEUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUHC.LMEUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-36.31%

+8.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-11.53%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-14.53%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.62%

-32.40%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.44%

-36.31%

+8.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.36%

-0.83%

-2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-9.38%

+4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

3.25%

+0.95%

Volatility

IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) at 4.22%. This indicates that IUHC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUHC.LMEUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

4.22%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.82%

12.16%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

14.68%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

19.17%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.74%

19.34%

-3.60%

IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUHC.L and MEUD.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUHC.L nor MEUD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUHC.L and MEUD.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUHC.L and MEUD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

IUHC.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while MEUD.L is Europe Equities. IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUHC.L and MEUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer