IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L
IUHC.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IUHC.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while MEUD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUHC.L returned 9.60%/yr vs 10.43%/yr for MEUD.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUHC.L is traded in USD, while MEUD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MEUD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUHC.L achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than MEUD.L's 7.32% return. Over the past 10 years, IUHC.L has underperformed MEUD.L with an annualized return of 9.60%, while MEUD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.43% annualized return.
IUHC.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 14.44%
- 3Y*
- 6.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
MEUD.L
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 7.32%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.88% | 14.72% | 2.16% | 1.72% | -2.63% | 27.58% | 11.93% | 20.55% | 4.52% | 22.16% |
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 7.32% | 36.05% | 1.93% | 19.47% | -15.19% | 16.00% | 7.03% | 25.23% | -14.71% | 26.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUHC.L and MEUD.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.52 |
The correlation between IUHC.L and MEUD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUHC.L
MEUD.L
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
IUHC.L
MEUD.L
Basic Materials
IUHC.L
-
MEUD.L
Communication Services
IUHC.L
-
MEUD.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUHC.L
-
MEUD.L
Consumer Defensive
IUHC.L
-
MEUD.L
Energy
IUHC.L
-
MEUD.L
Financial Services
IUHC.L
-
MEUD.L
Industrials
IUHC.L
-
MEUD.L
Real Estate
IUHC.L
-
MEUD.L
Technology
IUHC.L
-
MEUD.L
Utilities
IUHC.L
-
MEUD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUHC.L
MEUD.L
IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUHC.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.54 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 5.48 | -2.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum MEUD.L drawdown of -36.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and MEUD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUHC.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -36.31% | +8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -11.53% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -14.53% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.62% | -32.40% | +14.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.44% | -36.31% | +8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -0.83% | -2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -9.38% | +4.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 3.25% | +0.95% |
Volatility
IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) at 4.22%. This indicates that IUHC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUHC.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 4.22% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | 12.16% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 14.68% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 19.17% | -4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 19.34% | -3.60% |
IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUHC.L and MEUD.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUHC.L vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUHC.L nor MEUD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUHC.L and MEUD.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUHC.L and MEUD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
IUHC.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while MEUD.L is Europe Equities. IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.
Find the right allocation for IUHC.L and MEUD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer