PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUHC.L vs. IUES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUHC.L achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 30.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUHC.L having a 9.20% annualized return and IUES.L not far ahead at 9.21%.


IUHC.L

1D
3.00%
1M
4.72%
YTD
-2.09%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
9.20%

IUES.L

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
30.45%
6M
29.22%
1Y
46.28%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUHC.L
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-2.09%14.67%2.16%1.72%-2.63%27.58%11.93%20.60%4.44%22.21%
IUES.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
30.45%9.82%3.87%-0.63%63.84%51.95%-33.35%8.81%-18.12%-1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between IUHC.L and IUES.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015

0.30

The correlation between IUHC.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUHC.L
IUES.L

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IUHC.L
100.0%
IUES.L

-

Basic Materials

IUHC.L

-

IUES.L

-

Communication Services

IUHC.L

-

IUES.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IUHC.L

-

IUES.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IUHC.L

-

IUES.L

-

Energy

IUHC.L

-

IUES.L
100.0%

Financial Services

IUHC.L

-

IUES.L

-

Industrials

IUHC.L

-

IUES.L

-

Real Estate

IUHC.L

-

IUES.L

-

Technology

IUHC.L

-

IUES.L

-

Utilities

IUHC.L

-

IUES.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUHC.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUHC.L
IUHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IUES.L
IUES.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IUES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IUES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUHC.LIUES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.35

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.18

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.57

9.97

-6.40

IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the IUES.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUHC.L and IUES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUHC.LIUES.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

2.12

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.76

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.32

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.31

+0.25

Drawdowns

IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -66.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and IUES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUHC.LIUES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-66.78%

+39.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.44%

-14.49%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.63%

-20.90%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.63%

-27.98%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.44%

-66.78%

+39.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.57%

-7.45%

+2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-14.21%

+9.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

4.63%

-0.43%

Volatility

IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) is 4.89%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that IUHC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUHC.LIUES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

8.13%

-3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

18.58%

-7.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

21.81%

-6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.82%

26.72%

-11.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

28.49%

-12.78%

IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUHC.L and IUES.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUHC.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUHC.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUHC.L and IUES.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

IUHC.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUHC.L and IUES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer