IUHC.L vs. IUES.L
IUHC.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IUHC.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while IUES.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUHC.L returned 9.20%/yr vs 9.21%/yr for IUES.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUHC.L achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 30.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUHC.L having a 9.20% annualized return and IUES.L not far ahead at 9.21%.
IUHC.L
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
IUES.L
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 30.45%
- 6M
- 29.22%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -2.09% | 14.67% | 2.16% | 1.72% | -2.63% | 27.58% | 11.93% | 20.60% | 4.44% | 22.21% |
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.45% | 9.82% | 3.87% | -0.63% | 63.84% | 51.95% | -33.35% | 8.81% | -18.12% | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUHC.L and IUES.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015 | 0.30 |
The correlation between IUHC.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUHC.L
IUES.L
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IUHC.L
IUES.L
-
Basic Materials
IUHC.L
-
IUES.L
-
Communication Services
IUHC.L
-
IUES.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IUHC.L
-
IUES.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IUHC.L
-
IUES.L
-
Energy
IUHC.L
-
IUES.L
Financial Services
IUHC.L
-
IUES.L
-
Industrials
IUHC.L
-
IUES.L
-
Real Estate
IUHC.L
-
IUES.L
-
Technology
IUHC.L
-
IUES.L
-
Utilities
IUHC.L
-
IUES.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUHC.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUHC.L
IUES.L
IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUHC.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 3.18 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 9.97 | -6.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUHC.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 2.12 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.76 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.32 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.31 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -66.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and IUES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUHC.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -66.78% | +39.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.44% | -14.49% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.63% | -20.90% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.63% | -27.98% | +10.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.44% | -66.78% | +39.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.57% | -7.45% | +2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -14.21% | +9.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 4.63% | -0.43% |
Volatility
IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) is 4.89%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that IUHC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUHC.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 8.13% | -3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 18.58% | -7.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 21.81% | -6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.82% | 26.72% | -11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 28.49% | -12.78% |
IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUHC.L and IUES.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUHC.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUHC.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUHC.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUHC.L and IUES.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
IUHC.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD.
Find the right allocation for IUHC.L and IUES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer