IUHC.L vs. INRG.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

IUHC.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and INRG.L (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - IUHC.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while INRG.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUHC.L returned 9.45%/yr vs 9.33%/yr for INRG.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUHC.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INRG.L.

Performance

IUHC.L vs. INRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IUHC.L is traded in USD, while INRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INRG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUHC.L achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than INRG.L's 16.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUHC.L having a 9.45% annualized return and INRG.L not far behind at 9.33%.

IUHC.L

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 4.22%
• 6M: 1.83%
• YTD: 2.89%
• 1Y: 21.38%
• 3Y*: 8.05%
• 5Y*: 5.73%
• 10Y*: 9.45%

INRG.L

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -8.92%
• 6M: 9.28%
• YTD: 16.42%
• 1Y: 42.39%
• 3Y*: 1.88%
• 5Y*: -2.07%
• 10Y*: 9.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUHC.L vs. INRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	2.89%	14.72%	2.16%	1.72%	-2.63%	27.58%	11.93%	20.55%	4.52%	22.16%
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	16.42%	44.28%	-25.89%	-19.97%	-5.86%	-24.60%	141.91%	44.08%	-8.92%	19.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IUHC.L and INRG.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015	0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between IUHC.L and INRG.L has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUHC.L vs. INRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUHC.L	INRG.L
Healthcare	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	1.4%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	30.2%
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Industrials	-	23.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	7.0%
Utilities	-	36.5%

Return for Risk

IUHC.L vs. INRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUHC.L

IUHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 47
IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
IUHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IUHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 46
IUHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
IUHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 39

INRG.L

INRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 51
INRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
INRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
INRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
INRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
INRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUHC.L vs. INRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IUHC.L	INRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.52	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.12	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.25	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	2.11	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.06	6.87	-1.81

IUHC.L vs. INRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the INRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUHC.L and INRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IUHC.L vs. INRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum INRG.L drawdown of -93.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and INRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUHC.L	INRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.44%	-93.70%	+66.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-20.00%	+9.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.62%	-44.14%	+26.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.62%	-57.52%	+39.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.44%	-67.67%	+40.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.39%	-75.87%	+72.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	-81.53%	+76.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.21%	6.15%	-1.94%

Volatility

IUHC.L vs. INRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) is 5.97%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) has a volatility of 10.86%. This indicates that IUHC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUHC.L	INRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	10.86%	-4.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.61%	22.26%	-10.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.58%	27.72%	-12.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.99%	27.23%	-12.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.77%	26.74%	-10.97%

IUHC.L vs. INRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUHC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than INRG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUHC.L vs. INRG.L - Dividend Comparison

IUHC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INRG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	0.99%	1.34%	1.24%	0.80%	0.51%	0.74%	0.48%	1.60%	2.81%	2.83%	2.73%	2.55%
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUHC.L and INRG.L in my portfolio?

IUHC.L and INRG.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IUHC.L or INRG.L?

On fees, IUHC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUHC.L or INRG.L?

IUHC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INRG.L.

What is the main difference between IUHC.L and INRG.L?

IUHC.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while INRG.L is Energy Equities. IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while INRG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUHC.L and 0.65% for INRG.L.