IUHC.L vs. HSJP.L
IUHC.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and HSJP.L (HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - IUHC.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while HSJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUHC.L returned 5.75%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for HSJP.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUHC.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for HSJP.L.
Performance
IUHC.L vs. HSJP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUHC.L is traded in USD, while HSJP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSJP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUHC.L achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly lower than HSJP.L's 12.94% return.
IUHC.L
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
HSJP.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 7.27%
- YTD
- 12.94%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 28.86%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- —
IUHC.L vs. HSJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -2.09% | 14.67% | 2.16% | 1.72% | -2.63% | 27.58% | 9.28% |
HSJP.L HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 12.94% | 27.16% | 12.03% | 19.23% | -15.43% | 3.60% | 23.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUHC.L and HSJP.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020 | 0.36 |
IUHC.L vs. HSJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUHC.L
HSJP.L
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
IUHC.L
HSJP.L
Basic Materials
IUHC.L
-
HSJP.L
Communication Services
IUHC.L
-
HSJP.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUHC.L
-
HSJP.L
Consumer Defensive
IUHC.L
-
HSJP.L
Energy
IUHC.L
-
HSJP.L
Financial Services
IUHC.L
-
HSJP.L
Industrials
IUHC.L
-
HSJP.L
Real Estate
IUHC.L
-
HSJP.L
Technology
IUHC.L
-
HSJP.L
Utilities
IUHC.L
-
HSJP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUHC.L vs. HSJP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUHC.L
HSJP.L
IUHC.L vs. HSJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUHC.L | HSJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.27 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.95 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 5.96 | -2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUHC.L | HSJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.43 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.55 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.72 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
IUHC.L vs. HSJP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum HSJP.L drawdown of -30.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and HSJP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUHC.L | HSJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -30.78% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.44% | -14.72% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.63% | -14.72% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.63% | -30.78% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.57% | -2.00% | -2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -7.67% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 4.83% | -0.63% |
Volatility
IUHC.L vs. HSJP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that IUHC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUHC.L | HSJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 4.10% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 16.25% | -5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 20.12% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.82% | 18.19% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 17.86% | -2.15% |
IUHC.L vs. HSJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUHC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HSJP.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUHC.L vs. HSJP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUHC.L nor HSJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUHC.L and HSJP.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUHC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUHC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HSJP.L.
IUHC.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while HSJP.L is Japan Equities. IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while HSJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUHC.L and 0.18% for HSJP.L.
Find the right allocation for IUHC.L and HSJP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer