IUHC.L vs. HEAL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IUHC.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and HEAL (Global X HealthTech ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IUHC.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index while HEAL tracks the Global X HealthTech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUHC.L returned 5.75%/yr vs -14.16%/yr for HEAL. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUHC.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HEAL.

Performance

IUHC.L vs. HEAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUHC.L achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly higher than HEAL's -12.84% return.

IUHC.L

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: 4.72%
• YTD: -2.09%
• 6M: -0.45%
• 1Y: 15.03%
• 3Y*: 6.58%
• 5Y*: 5.75%
• 10Y*: 9.20%

HEAL

• 1D: 3.24%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: -12.84%
• 6M: -18.63%
• 1Y: -19.59%
• 3Y*: -9.61%
• 5Y*: -14.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUHC.L vs. HEAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-2.09%	14.67%	2.16%	1.72%	-2.63%	27.58%	6.95%
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF	-12.84%	-0.62%	-2.87%	-12.61%	-29.99%	-14.21%	23.87%

Correlation

The correlation between IUHC.L and HEAL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020	0.30

IUHC.L vs. HEAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUHC.L	HEAL
Healthcare	100.0%	96.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	3.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IUHC.L vs. HEAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUHC.L

IUHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
IUHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
IUHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 27
IUHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
IUHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

HEAL

HEAL Risk / Return Rank: 3
HEAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
HEAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
HEAL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
HEAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
HEAL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUHC.L vs. HEAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IUHC.L	HEAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	-0.89	+1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	-1.20	+2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.87	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	-0.64	+2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.57	-1.29	+4.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUHC.L vs. HEAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the HEAL Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUHC.L and HEAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IUHC.L	HEAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	-0.89	+1.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	-0.54	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	-0.38	+0.94

Drawdowns

IUHC.L vs. HEAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum HEAL drawdown of -65.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and HEAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUHC.L	HEAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.44%	-65.76%	+38.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.44%	-30.71%	+20.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.63%	-35.78%	+18.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.63%	-60.36%	+42.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.57%	-62.37%	+57.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-43.04%	+38.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.20%	15.21%	-11.01%

Volatility

IUHC.L vs. HEAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) is 4.89%, while Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that IUHC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUHC.L	HEAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	6.11%	-1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.81%	16.03%	-5.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.00%	22.13%	-7.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.82%	26.41%	-11.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.71%	26.21%	-10.50%

IUHC.L vs. HEAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUHC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HEAL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUHC.L vs. HEAL - Dividend Comparison

IUHC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF	0.38%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUHC.L and HEAL in my portfolio?

IUHC.L and HEAL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IUHC.L or HEAL?

On fees, IUHC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUHC.L or HEAL?

IUHC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HEAL.

What is the main difference between IUHC.L and HEAL?

IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while HEAL tracks Global X HealthTech Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUHC.L and 0.50% for HEAL.