PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUHC.L vs. BTEE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUHC.L vs. BTEE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUHC.L achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly lower than BTEE.L's 4.58% return.


IUHC.L

1D
3.00%
1M
4.72%
YTD
-2.09%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
9.20%

BTEE.L

1D
3.30%
1M
1.17%
YTD
4.58%
6M
3.18%
1Y
41.45%
3Y*
13.12%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUHC.L vs. BTEE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUHC.L
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-2.09%14.67%2.16%1.72%-2.63%27.58%11.93%20.60%2.30%
BTEE.L
iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.58%32.82%-1.69%5.84%-11.88%-0.57%27.55%25.56%-14.84%

Correlation

The correlation between IUHC.L and BTEE.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018

0.68

The correlation between IUHC.L and BTEE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUHC.L vs. BTEE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUHC.L
BTEE.L

Healthcare

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IUHC.L
100.0%
BTEE.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

IUHC.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Communication Services

IUHC.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IUHC.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IUHC.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Energy

IUHC.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Financial Services

IUHC.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Industrials

IUHC.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Real Estate

IUHC.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Technology

IUHC.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Utilities

IUHC.L

-

BTEE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUHC.L vs. BTEE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUHC.L
IUHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BTEE.L
BTEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BTEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUHC.L vs. BTEE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUHC.LBTEE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.35

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

5.41

-3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.57

16.70

-13.13

IUHC.L vs. BTEE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the BTEE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUHC.L and BTEE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUHC.LBTEE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

2.10

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.22

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.30

+0.26

Drawdowns

IUHC.L vs. BTEE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum BTEE.L drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and BTEE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUHC.LBTEE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-38.29%

+10.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.44%

-7.63%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.63%

-26.82%

+9.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.63%

-38.29%

+20.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.57%

-2.58%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-13.56%

+8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

2.47%

+1.73%

Volatility

IUHC.L vs. BTEE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) is 4.89%, while iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that IUHC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTEE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUHC.LBTEE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

6.84%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

15.33%

-4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

19.63%

-4.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.82%

21.14%

-6.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

22.50%

-6.79%

IUHC.L vs. BTEE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUHC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BTEE.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUHC.L vs. BTEE.L - Dividend Comparison

IUHC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTEE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BTEE.L
iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.36%0.37%0.46%0.39%0.44%0.25%0.17%0.14%0.07%
IUHC.L
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUHC.L and BTEE.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUHC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUHC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BTEE.L.

IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while BTEE.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUHC.L and 0.35% for BTEE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUHC.L and BTEE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer