IUFS.L vs. INTL.L
IUFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) and INTL.L (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IUFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while INTL.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUFS.L returned 7.95%/yr vs 16.00%/yr for INTL.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUFS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for INTL.L.
Performance
IUFS.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUFS.L is traded in USD, while INTL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INTL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUFS.L achieves a -5.06% return, which is significantly lower than INTL.L's 48.66% return.
IUFS.L
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- -5.06%
- 6M
- -2.04%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 18.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
INTL.L
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 18.66%
- YTD
- 48.66%
- 6M
- 49.24%
- 1Y
- 91.38%
- 3Y*
- 34.19%
- 5Y*
- 16.00%
- 10Y*
- —
IUFS.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | -5.06% | 15.05% | 30.22% | 12.12% | -11.04% | 36.28% | -3.33% | 20.55% |
INTL.L WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 48.66% | 23.14% | 11.68% | 56.56% | -42.06% | 16.29% | 74.16% | 35.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUFS.L and INTL.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2019 | 0.48 |
The correlation between IUFS.L and INTL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUFS.L vs. INTL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUFS.L
INTL.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IUFS.L
INTL.L
Technology
IUFS.L
INTL.L
Industrials
IUFS.L
INTL.L
Basic Materials
IUFS.L
-
INTL.L
-
Communication Services
IUFS.L
-
INTL.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUFS.L
-
INTL.L
Consumer Defensive
IUFS.L
-
INTL.L
Energy
IUFS.L
-
INTL.L
-
Healthcare
IUFS.L
-
INTL.L
Real Estate
IUFS.L
-
INTL.L
-
Utilities
IUFS.L
-
INTL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUFS.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUFS.L
INTL.L
IUFS.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUFS.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.52 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 5.91 | -5.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 18.42 | -17.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUFS.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 3.47 | -3.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.58 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.91 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
IUFS.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUFS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, smaller than the maximum INTL.L drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUFS.L and INTL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUFS.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.92% | -48.41% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -15.38% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.62% | -31.15% | +14.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.02% | -46.21% | +20.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.87% | -1.19% | -5.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -13.96% | +6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.54% | 4.94% | +0.60% |
Volatility
IUFS.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) is 4.43%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that IUFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUFS.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 9.61% | -5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 19.60% | -8.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.73% | 26.18% | -11.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 27.54% | -8.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 28.09% | -7.00% |
IUFS.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUFS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUFS.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUFS.L nor INTL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUFS.L and INTL.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for INTL.L.
IUFS.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while INTL.L is Technology Equities. IUFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUFS.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.
Find the right allocation for IUFS.L and INTL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer