IUFS.L vs. CSPX.L
IUFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) and CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IUFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while CSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUFS.L returned 12.03%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for CSPX.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUFS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSPX.L.
Performance
IUFS.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUFS.L achieves a -7.99% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.L's 10.31% return. Over the past 10 years, IUFS.L has underperformed CSPX.L with an annualized return of 12.03%, while CSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.
IUFS.L
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- -7.99%
- 6M
- -4.48%
- 1Y
- 0.59%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
CSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- 22.31%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
IUFS.L vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | -7.99% | 15.05% | 30.22% | 12.12% | -11.04% | 36.28% | -3.33% | 31.22% | -14.36% | 23.02% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.31% | 17.45% | 25.25% | 26.74% | -18.72% | 29.35% | 17.62% | 30.55% | -5.46% | 21.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUFS.L and CSPX.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IUFS.L and CSPX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUFS.L vs. CSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUFS.L
CSPX.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
IUFS.L
CSPX.L
Technology
IUFS.L
CSPX.L
Industrials
IUFS.L
CSPX.L
Basic Materials
IUFS.L
-
CSPX.L
Communication Services
IUFS.L
-
CSPX.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUFS.L
-
CSPX.L
Consumer Defensive
IUFS.L
-
CSPX.L
Energy
IUFS.L
-
CSPX.L
Healthcare
IUFS.L
-
CSPX.L
Real Estate
IUFS.L
-
CSPX.L
Utilities
IUFS.L
-
CSPX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUFS.L vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUFS.L
CSPX.L
IUFS.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUFS.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.43 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 3.40 | -3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | 14.75 | -14.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUFS.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | 2.36 | -2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.86 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.94 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.94 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
IUFS.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUFS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUFS.L and CSPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUFS.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.92% | -33.90% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -8.17% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.62% | -18.50% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.02% | -24.39% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.92% | -33.90% | -9.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.74% | -0.54% | -9.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -3.72% | -4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 1.90% | +3.62% |
Volatility
IUFS.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUFS.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 3.30% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | 8.71% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.40% | 11.84% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 15.97% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 16.19% | +4.88% |
IUFS.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUFS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUFS.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUFS.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUFS.L and CSPX.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSPX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUFS.L.
IUFS.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while CSPX.L is S&P 500. IUFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index, while CSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUFS.L and 0.07% for CSPX.L.
Find the right allocation for IUFS.L and CSPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer