PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUES.L vs. SXLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUES.L vs. SXLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IUES.L having a 30.45% return and SXLE.L slightly higher at 30.51%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUES.L having a 9.21% annualized return and SXLE.L not far ahead at 9.59%.


IUES.L

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
30.45%
6M
29.22%
1Y
46.28%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
9.21%

SXLE.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
30.51%
6M
29.43%
1Y
46.36%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
20.21%
10Y*
9.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUES.L vs. SXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUES.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
30.45%9.82%3.87%-0.63%63.84%51.95%-33.35%8.81%-18.12%-1.19%
SXLE.L
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF
30.51%9.74%3.75%0.62%62.75%50.77%-31.89%9.19%-18.13%-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IUES.L and SXLE.L is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015

0.99

The correlation between IUES.L and SXLE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUES.L vs. SXLE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUES.L
SXLE.L

Energy

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

IUES.L
100.0%
SXLE.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

IUES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Communication Services

IUES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IUES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IUES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Financial Services

IUES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Healthcare

IUES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Industrials

IUES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Real Estate

IUES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Technology

IUES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Utilities

IUES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUES.L vs. SXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUES.L
IUES.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IUES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IUES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SXLE.L
SXLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUES.L vs. SXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUES.LSXLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.17

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.97

9.94

+0.02

IUES.L vs. SXLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUES.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUES.L and SXLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUES.LSXLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.12

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.76

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.33

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.35

-0.03

Drawdowns

IUES.L vs. SXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUES.L drawdown since its inception was -66.78%, roughly equal to the maximum SXLE.L drawdown of -66.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUES.L and SXLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUES.LSXLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.78%

-66.60%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-14.55%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-20.90%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.98%

-27.87%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.78%

-66.60%

-0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.45%

-7.44%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.21%

-13.96%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

4.65%

-0.02%

Volatility

IUES.L vs. SXLE.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) have volatilities of 8.13% and 8.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUES.LSXLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

8.15%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

18.52%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.81%

21.87%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.72%

26.65%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.49%

28.66%

-0.17%

IUES.L vs. SXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUES.L and SXLE.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUES.L vs. SXLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUES.L nor SXLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, IUES.L and SXLE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUES.L and SXLE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUES.L and SXLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer