IUES.L vs. IUUS.L
IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IUUS.L (iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IUES.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while IUUS.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUES.L returned 20.33%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for IUUS.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
IUES.L vs. IUUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUES.L achieves a 30.45% return, which is significantly higher than IUUS.L's 1.37% return.
IUES.L
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 30.45%
- 6M
- 29.22%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
IUUS.L
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- 8.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
IUES.L vs. IUUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.45% | 9.82% | 3.87% | -0.63% | 63.84% | 51.95% | -33.35% | 8.81% | -18.12% | 8.36% |
IUUS.L iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.37% | 15.80% | 22.91% | -8.06% | 2.07% | 18.39% | -1.11% | 24.68% | 3.14% | 3.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUES.L and IUUS.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.19 |
The correlation between IUES.L and IUUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUES.L vs. IUUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUES.L
IUUS.L
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
IUES.L
IUUS.L
-
Basic Materials
IUES.L
-
IUUS.L
-
Communication Services
IUES.L
-
IUUS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IUES.L
-
IUUS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IUES.L
-
IUUS.L
-
Financial Services
IUES.L
-
IUUS.L
-
Healthcare
IUES.L
-
IUUS.L
-
Industrials
IUES.L
-
IUUS.L
-
Real Estate
IUES.L
-
IUUS.L
-
Technology
IUES.L
-
IUUS.L
-
Utilities
IUES.L
-
IUUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUES.L vs. IUUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUES.L
IUUS.L
IUES.L vs. IUUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUES.L | IUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.11 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 0.94 | +2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.97 | 2.01 | +7.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUES.L | IUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.59 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.49 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.46 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
IUES.L vs. IUUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUES.L drawdown since its inception was -66.78%, which is greater than IUUS.L's maximum drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUES.L and IUUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUES.L | IUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.78% | -36.26% | -30.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -8.96% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -18.30% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.98% | -26.26% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.45% | -8.96% | +1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -6.62% | -7.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 4.20% | +0.43% |
Volatility
IUES.L vs. IUUS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUUS.L) at 4.97%. This indicates that IUES.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUES.L | IUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 4.97% | +3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.58% | 11.62% | +6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.81% | 14.27% | +7.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.72% | 17.05% | +9.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.49% | 18.37% | +10.12% |
IUES.L vs. IUUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUES.L and IUUS.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUES.L vs. IUUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUES.L nor IUUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUES.L and IUUS.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUES.L and IUUS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
IUES.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while IUUS.L is S&P 500. IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while IUUS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities.
Find the right allocation for IUES.L and IUUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer