IUES.L vs. IESU.L
IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IESU.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds from iShares - IUES.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while IESU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUES.L returned 8.75%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for IESU.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
IUES.L vs. IESU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUES.L is traded in USD, while IESU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IESU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IUES.L having a 28.42% return and IESU.L slightly higher at 28.54%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUES.L having a 8.75% annualized return and IESU.L not far ahead at 8.78%.
IUES.L
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- YTD
- 28.42%
- 1Y
- 36.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
IESU.L
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- YTD
- 28.54%
- 1Y
- 36.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.63%
- 5Y*
- 22.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
IUES.L vs. IESU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.42% | 9.91% | 3.87% | -0.66% | 63.84% | 51.95% | -33.35% | 8.70% | -18.12% | -1.05% |
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.54% | 9.98% | 3.69% | -1.00% | 63.91% | 52.43% | -33.64% | 9.60% | -18.29% | -1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUES.L and IESU.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.96 |
The correlation between IUES.L and IESU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUES.L vs. IESU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUES.L
IESU.L
IUES.L vs. IESU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUES.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 2.21 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | 5.65 | +0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUES.L vs. IESU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUES.L drawdown since its inception was -66.79%, smaller than the maximum IESU.L drawdown of -72.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUES.L and IESU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUES.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.79% | -72.57% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.33% | -16.37% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -22.55% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.98% | -27.74% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.79% | -66.85% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -8.87% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -24.88% | +10.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.40% | 6.42% | -0.02% |
Volatility
IUES.L vs. IESU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) have volatilities of 6.91% and 6.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUES.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 6.97% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.69% | 21.03% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.76% | 23.89% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 29.47% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 29.81% | -1.28% |
IUES.L vs. IESU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUES.L and IESU.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUES.L vs. IESU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUES.L nor IESU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IUES.L and IESU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUES.L and IESU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR.
Find the right allocation for IUES.L and IESU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer