IUES.L vs. HDLV.L
IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and HDLV.L (Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - IUES.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while HDLV.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUES.L returned 9.21%/yr vs 6.48%/yr for HDLV.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUES.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for HDLV.L.
Performance
IUES.L vs. HDLV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUES.L achieves a 30.45% return, which is significantly higher than HDLV.L's 4.40% return. Over the past 10 years, IUES.L has outperformed HDLV.L with an annualized return of 9.21%, while HDLV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.48% annualized return.
IUES.L
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 30.45%
- 6M
- 29.22%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
HDLV.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 8.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
IUES.L vs. HDLV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.45% | 9.82% | 3.87% | -0.63% | 63.84% | 51.95% | -33.35% | 8.81% | -18.12% | -1.19% |
HDLV.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist | 4.40% | 3.58% | 16.39% | 1.20% | 0.46% | 24.79% | -10.93% | 18.82% | -7.10% | 11.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUES.L and HDLV.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IUES.L and HDLV.L has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IUES.L vs. HDLV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUES.L
HDLV.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
IUES.L
HDLV.L
Basic Materials
IUES.L
-
HDLV.L
-
Communication Services
IUES.L
-
HDLV.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUES.L
-
HDLV.L
Consumer Defensive
IUES.L
-
HDLV.L
Financial Services
IUES.L
-
HDLV.L
Healthcare
IUES.L
-
HDLV.L
Industrials
IUES.L
-
HDLV.L
Real Estate
IUES.L
-
HDLV.L
Technology
IUES.L
-
HDLV.L
Utilities
IUES.L
-
HDLV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUES.L vs. HDLV.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUES.L
HDLV.L
IUES.L vs. HDLV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUES.L | HDLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.14 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 1.21 | +1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.97 | 2.80 | +7.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUES.L | HDLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.82 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.36 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.40 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.47 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
IUES.L vs. HDLV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUES.L drawdown since its inception was -66.78%, which is greater than HDLV.L's maximum drawdown of -41.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUES.L and HDLV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUES.L | HDLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.78% | -41.02% | -25.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -7.16% | -7.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -14.59% | -6.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.98% | -20.04% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.78% | -41.02% | -25.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.45% | -5.15% | -2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -5.70% | -8.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 3.10% | +1.53% |
Volatility
IUES.L vs. HDLV.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) at 3.06%. This indicates that IUES.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDLV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUES.L | HDLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 3.06% | +5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.58% | 7.60% | +10.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.81% | 10.52% | +11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.72% | 13.99% | +12.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.49% | 16.16% | +12.33% |
IUES.L vs. HDLV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUES.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HDLV.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUES.L vs. HDLV.L - Dividend Comparison
IUES.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDLV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLV.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist | 3.74% | 3.91% | 3.54% | 4.04% | 3.56% | 3.37% | 4.35% | 3.69% | 3.79% | 3.07% | 3.07% | 1.89% |
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUES.L and HDLV.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUES.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUES.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HDLV.L.
IUES.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while HDLV.L is S&P 500. IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while HDLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUES.L and 0.30% for HDLV.L.
Find the right allocation for IUES.L and HDLV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer