PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUES.L vs. GXLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUES.L vs. GXLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUES.L is traded in USD, while GXLE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GXLE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IUES.L having a 30.45% return and GXLE.L slightly lower at 30.33%.


IUES.L

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
30.45%
6M
29.22%
1Y
46.28%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
9.21%

GXLE.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
30.33%
6M
29.35%
1Y
46.25%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUES.L vs. GXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IUES.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
30.45%9.82%3.87%-0.63%16.85%
GXLE.L
SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF
30.33%9.94%3.75%-0.02%16.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IUES.L and GXLE.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.96

The correlation between IUES.L and GXLE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUES.L vs. GXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUES.L
IUES.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IUES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IUES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GXLE.L
GXLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GXLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUES.L vs. GXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUES.LGXLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.16

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.97

10.18

-0.21

IUES.L vs. GXLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUES.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the GXLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUES.L and GXLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUES.LGXLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.01

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.54

-0.23

Drawdowns

IUES.L vs. GXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUES.L drawdown since its inception was -66.78%, which is greater than GXLE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUES.L and GXLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUES.LGXLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.78%

-27.58%

-39.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-14.58%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-20.63%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.45%

-7.32%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.21%

-7.70%

-6.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

4.53%

+0.10%

Volatility

IUES.L vs. GXLE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) is 8.13%, while SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLE.L) has a volatility of 8.86%. This indicates that IUES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUES.LGXLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

8.86%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

19.74%

-1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.81%

22.92%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.72%

25.98%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.49%

25.98%

+2.51%

IUES.L vs. GXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUES.L and GXLE.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUES.L vs. GXLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUES.L nor GXLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IUES.L and GXLE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUES.L and GXLE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUES.L and GXLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer