IUCB.L vs. FRUC.L
IUCB.L (SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and FRUC.L (Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, from State Street and Franklin Templeton respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUCB.L returned 1.88%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FRUC.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUCB.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FRUC.L.
Performance
IUCB.L vs. FRUC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUCB.L is traded in USD, while FRUC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FRUC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUCB.L achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than FRUC.L's -0.10% return.
IUCB.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- —
FRUC.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.18%
- 10Y*
- —
IUCB.L vs. FRUC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUCB.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.43% | 7.84% | 4.54% | 7.17% | -9.26% | -1.61% | 7.94% | 8.74% | -0.57% |
FRUC.L Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | -0.10% | 7.80% | 2.02% | 7.11% | -15.54% | -1.91% | 9.31% | 15.38% | 0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUCB.L and FRUC.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018 | 0.40 |
The correlation between IUCB.L and FRUC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.61 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUCB.L vs. FRUC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
Healthcare
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
Technology
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
-
Energy
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
Communication Services
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
Industrials
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
-
Utilities
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
-
Real Estate
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
-
Basic Materials
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUCB.L vs. FRUC.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUCB.L
FRUC.L
IUCB.L vs. FRUC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IUCB.L) and Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FRUC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUCB.L | FRUC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.16 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 1.68 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.50 | 5.24 | +3.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUCB.L | FRUC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.94 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.02 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.32 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
IUCB.L vs. FRUC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUCB.L drawdown since its inception was -14.12%, smaller than the maximum FRUC.L drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUCB.L and FRUC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUCB.L | FRUC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -22.64% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.00% | -3.11% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.53% | -6.51% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.00% | -22.33% | +8.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -2.75% | +2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -6.86% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 1.00% | -0.39% |
Volatility
IUCB.L vs. FRUC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IUCB.L) is 1.09%, while Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FRUC.L) has a volatility of 1.95%. This indicates that IUCB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRUC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUCB.L | FRUC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 1.95% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | 4.16% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 5.58% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 7.56% | -2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.66% | 8.30% | -0.64% |
IUCB.L vs. FRUC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUCB.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FRUC.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUCB.L vs. FRUC.L - Dividend Comparison
IUCB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than FRUC.L's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRUC.L Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.01% | 4.02% | 4.19% | 3.44% | 2.71% | 2.13% | 2.42% | 3.45% | 1.64% |
IUCB.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.67% | 4.66% | 4.70% | 3.89% | 2.62% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUCB.L and FRUC.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUCB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUCB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FRUC.L.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IUCB.L and 0.35% for FRUC.L.
Find the right allocation for IUCB.L and FRUC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer