PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUAG.L vs. IUAA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUAG.L vs. IUAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (IUAG.L) and iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUAG.L achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than IUAA.L's -0.17% return.


IUAG.L

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.49%
6M
-0.10%
YTD
-0.08%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
1.21%

IUAA.L

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.52%
6M
-0.00%
YTD
-0.17%
1Y
4.17%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
-0.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUAG.L vs. IUAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUAG.L
iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing
-0.08%7.04%1.36%5.01%-12.86%-2.00%7.04%8.64%-0.38%1.81%
IUAA.L
iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc
-0.17%7.28%1.13%4.97%-12.82%-2.02%7.08%8.66%-0.39%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between IUAG.L and IUAA.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2017

0.81

The correlation between IUAG.L and IUAA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUAG.L vs. IUAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUAG.L
IUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IUAA.L
IUAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IUAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IUAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUAG.L vs. IUAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (IUAG.L) and iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUAG.LIUAA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.35

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.69

3.75

-0.06

IUAG.L vs. IUAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the IUAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUAG.L and IUAA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUAG.L vs. IUAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUAG.L drawdown since its inception was -19.01%, roughly equal to the maximum IUAA.L drawdown of -19.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUAG.L and IUAA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUAG.LIUAA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.01%

-19.02%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-3.08%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.97%

-6.00%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.19%

-18.11%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.45%

-3.50%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-5.53%

+1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.11%

0.00%

Volatility

IUAG.L vs. IUAA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (IUAG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUAA.L) at 1.04%. This indicates that IUAG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUAG.LIUAA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

1.04%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

3.21%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

4.18%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.16%

6.11%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.26%

5.37%

-0.11%

IUAG.L vs. IUAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUAG.L and IUAA.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUAG.L vs. IUAA.L - Dividend Comparison

IUAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, while IUAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUAA.L
iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUAG.L
iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing
3.90%3.72%3.62%3.02%2.12%1.72%2.05%2.64%2.44%2.04%1.72%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUAG.L and IUAA.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUAG.L and IUAA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUAG.L and IUAA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer