PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUAE.L vs. PRIG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUAE.L vs. PRIG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (IUAE.L) and Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUAE.L is traded in EUR, while PRIG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRIG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUAE.L achieves a -1.30% return, which is significantly lower than PRIG.L's 1.02% return.


IUAE.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.90%
6M
-1.30%
YTD
-1.30%
1Y
2.05%
3Y*
1.62%
5Y*
-2.40%
10Y*

PRIG.L

1D
0.07%
1M
0.57%
6M
0.52%
YTD
1.02%
1Y
1.79%
3Y*
0.61%
5Y*
-2.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUAE.L vs. PRIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IUAE.L
iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF
-1.30%4.73%-0.64%2.65%-15.00%-2.82%5.50%4.96%
PRIG.L
Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.02%-5.40%2.94%1.01%-13.01%0.22%0.21%-4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IUAE.L and PRIG.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2019

0.48

The correlation between IUAE.L and PRIG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUAE.L vs. PRIG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUAE.L
IUAE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IUAE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUAE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUAE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
IUAE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUAE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PRIG.L
PRIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUAE.L vs. PRIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (IUAE.L) and Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUAE.LPRIG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.07

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

0.61

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.55

1.27

+0.28

IUAE.L vs. PRIG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUAE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is comparable to the PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUAE.L and PRIG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUAE.L vs. PRIG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUAE.L drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, roughly equal to the maximum PRIG.L drawdown of -23.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUAE.L and PRIG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUAE.LPRIG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.73%

-23.83%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.45%

-2.90%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.30%

-8.06%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

-17.78%

-3.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.83%

-21.20%

+7.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-15.27%

+6.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

1.40%

-0.08%

Volatility

IUAE.L vs. PRIG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (IUAE.L) and Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) have volatilities of 1.22% and 1.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUAE.LPRIG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.28%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

3.24%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

4.34%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.16%

6.96%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.51%

9.07%

-3.56%

IUAE.L vs. PRIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUAE.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIG.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUAE.L vs. PRIG.L - Dividend Comparison

IUAE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IUAE.L
iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRIG.L
Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)
3.02%2.96%2.31%1.97%1.72%1.50%1.75%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUAE.L and PRIG.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRIG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IUAE.L.

IUAE.L tracks iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF, while PRIG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IUAE.L and 0.05% for PRIG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUAE.L and PRIG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer