PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IU5C.DE vs. EFRW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IU5C.DE vs. EFRW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IU5C.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (EFRW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IU5C.DE achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly lower than EFRW.DE's 8.09% return.


IU5C.DE

1D
1.39%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
3.08%
6M
0.70%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
23.65%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*

EFRW.DE

1D
0.36%
1M
2.58%
YTD
8.09%
6M
8.98%
1Y
17.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IU5C.DE vs. EFRW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IU5C.DE and EFRW.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IU5C.DE vs. EFRW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IU5C.DE
IU5C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IU5C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IU5C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IU5C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IU5C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IU5C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

EFRW.DE
EFRW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EFRW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFRW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFRW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EFRW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFRW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IU5C.DE vs. EFRW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IU5C.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (EFRW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IU5C.DEEFRW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.37

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

8.32

-0.44

IU5C.DE vs. EFRW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IU5C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the EFRW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IU5C.DE and EFRW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IU5C.DEEFRW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.55

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.55

-0.82

Drawdowns

IU5C.DE vs. EFRW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IU5C.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.23%, which is greater than EFRW.DE's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IU5C.DE and EFRW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IU5C.DEEFRW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.23%

-7.12%

-32.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.06%

-7.12%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.21%

0.00%

-4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.63%

-1.35%

-7.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

2.03%

+0.34%

Volatility

IU5C.DE vs. EFRW.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IU5C.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (EFRW.DE) at 2.64%. This indicates that IU5C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFRW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IU5C.DEEFRW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

2.64%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

7.67%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

10.91%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.30%

11.32%

+7.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

11.32%

+8.59%

IU5C.DE vs. EFRW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IU5C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EFRW.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IU5C.DE vs. EFRW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IU5C.DE nor EFRW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IU5C.DE and EFRW.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IU5C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IU5C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for EFRW.DE.

IU5C.DE is categorized as Communications Equities, while EFRW.DE is S&P 500. IU5C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Communication Services, while EFRW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IU5C.DE and 0.17% for EFRW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IU5C.DE and EFRW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer