PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITPG.L vs. IRCP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITPG.L vs. IRCP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF (ITPG.L) and iShares € Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IRCP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ITPG.L is traded in GBP, while IRCP.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IRCP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITPG.L achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than IRCP.L's -1.35% return.


ITPG.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.47%
6M
0.29%
YTD
0.91%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*

IRCP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.86%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-1.35%
1Y
0.73%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
1.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITPG.L vs. IRCP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ITPG.L
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF
0.91%6.20%1.89%2.58%-13.77%6.17%10.05%6.89%-1.16%
IRCP.L
iShares € Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-1.35%9.79%1.63%3.04%2.28%-6.16%6.54%-1.90%-3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ITPG.L and IRCP.L is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITPG.L vs. IRCP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITPG.L
ITPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ITPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ITPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

IRCP.L
IRCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IRCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IRCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITPG.L vs. IRCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF (ITPG.L) and iShares € Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IRCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITPG.LIRCP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.03

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

0.32

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

0.87

+3.76

ITPG.L vs. IRCP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the IRCP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITPG.L and IRCP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITPG.L vs. IRCP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITPG.L drawdown since its inception was -16.78%, smaller than the maximum IRCP.L drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITPG.L and IRCP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITPG.LIRCP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.78%

-19.15%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.85%

-2.41%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

-2.41%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.78%

-8.09%

-8.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-2.41%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-5.61%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.87%

-0.11%

Volatility

ITPG.L vs. IRCP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF (ITPG.L) and iShares € Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IRCP.L) have volatilities of 1.00% and 1.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITPG.LIRCP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

1.05%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

3.47%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

4.62%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

6.05%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.36%

7.09%

-0.73%

ITPG.L vs. IRCP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITPG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IRCP.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITPG.L vs. IRCP.L - Dividend Comparison

ITPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than IRCP.L's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRCP.L
iShares € Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.58%2.91%3.70%2.52%0.43%0.70%0.82%0.92%0.58%0.71%1.35%1.47%
ITPG.L
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF
4.66%4.56%4.62%1.50%1.24%1.09%2.03%2.79%1.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITPG.L and IRCP.L have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ITPG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ITPG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IRCP.L.

ITPG.L tracks iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF, while IRCP.L tracks iShares € Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Dist). Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ITPG.L and 0.25% for IRCP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITPG.L and IRCP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer