PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITPG.L vs. GILI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITPG.L vs. GILI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITPG.L) and Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist (GILI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ITPG.L is traded in GBP, while GILI.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GILI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITPG.L achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than GILI.L's -1.15% return.


ITPG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.42%
6M
0.75%
YTD
0.96%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
-0.13%
10Y*

GILI.L

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.93%
6M
-2.71%
YTD
-1.15%
1Y
2.66%
3Y*
-1.12%
5Y*
-8.53%
10Y*
-1.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITPG.L vs. GILI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ITPG.L
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.96%6.20%1.89%2.58%-13.77%6.17%10.05%6.89%-1.16%
GILI.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist
-1.15%1.92%-8.80%0.74%-33.55%4.19%10.82%6.38%1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ITPG.L and GILI.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018

0.44

The correlation between ITPG.L and GILI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITPG.L vs. GILI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITPG.L
ITPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ITPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ITPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GILI.L
GILI.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GILI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
GILI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITPG.L vs. GILI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITPG.L) and Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist (GILI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITPG.LGILI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.06

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

0.42

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.86

0.98

+2.87

ITPG.L vs. GILI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the GILI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITPG.L and GILI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITPG.L vs. GILI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITPG.L drawdown since its inception was -16.78%, smaller than the maximum GILI.L drawdown of -49.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITPG.L and GILI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITPG.LGILI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.78%

-49.11%

+32.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.85%

-6.25%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

-14.26%

+9.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.78%

-49.11%

+32.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.83%

-42.30%

+38.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-13.60%

+8.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

2.70%

-1.93%

Volatility

ITPG.L vs. GILI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITPG.L) is 0.98%, while Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist (GILI.L) has a volatility of 2.07%. This indicates that ITPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GILI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITPG.LGILI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

2.07%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

6.38%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.39%

8.51%

-4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.38%

18.67%

-12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.35%

16.28%

-9.93%

ITPG.L vs. GILI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITPG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GILI.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITPG.L vs. GILI.L - Dividend Comparison

ITPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than GILI.L's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GILI.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist
0.69%0.68%0.65%0.50%0.46%0.29%0.28%0.33%0.35%0.38%0.79%
ITPG.L
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
4.66%4.56%4.62%1.50%1.24%1.09%2.03%2.79%1.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITPG.L and GILI.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GILI.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GILI.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for ITPG.L.

ITPG.L tracks BBG US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (USD), while GILI.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Index-Linked Gilts All Stocks. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Lyxor. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ITPG.L and 0.07% for GILI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITPG.L and GILI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer