ITPG.L vs. AGHG.L
ITPG.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF) and AGHG.L (Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)) are both Global Bonds funds - ITPG.L tracks the iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF while AGHG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITPG.L returned -0.14%/yr vs -0.09%/yr for AGHG.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITPG.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for AGHG.L.
Performance
ITPG.L vs. AGHG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ITPG.L is traded in GBP, while AGHG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AGHG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITPG.L achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than AGHG.L's 0.52% return.
ITPG.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.14%
- 10Y*
- —
AGHG.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- —
ITPG.L vs. AGHG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITPG.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF | 0.91% | 6.20% | 1.89% | 2.58% | -13.77% | 3.95% |
AGHG.L Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) | 0.52% | 4.32% | 2.99% | 5.41% | -11.93% | -0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITPG.L and AGHG.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021 | 0.67 |
The correlation between ITPG.L and AGHG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITPG.L vs. AGHG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ITPG.L
AGHG.L
ITPG.L vs. AGHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF (ITPG.L) and Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITPG.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.42 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | 3.84 | +0.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITPG.L vs. AGHG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITPG.L drawdown since its inception was -16.78%, which is greater than AGHG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITPG.L and AGHG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITPG.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.78% | -15.71% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.85% | -2.24% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.74% | -4.02% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.78% | -15.71% | -1.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | -1.82% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -7.24% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 0.83% | -0.07% |
Volatility
ITPG.L vs. AGHG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF (ITPG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) at 0.78%. This indicates that ITPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGHG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITPG.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 0.78% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | 2.27% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 2.86% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 4.12% | +2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 4.11% | +2.25% |
ITPG.L vs. AGHG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITPG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than AGHG.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ITPG.L vs. AGHG.L - Dividend Comparison
ITPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than AGHG.L's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGHG.L Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) | 2.97% | 2.98% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 2.18% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITPG.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF | 4.66% | 4.56% | 4.62% | 1.50% | 1.24% | 1.09% | 2.03% | 2.79% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITPG.L and AGHG.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGHG.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGHG.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for ITPG.L.
ITPG.L tracks iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF, while AGHG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ITPG.L and 0.08% for AGHG.L.
Find the right allocation for ITPG.L and AGHG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer