ITPG.L vs. 0GGH.L
ITPG.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF) and 0GGH.L (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) are both Global Bonds funds from iShares - ITPG.L tracks the iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF while 0GGH.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITPG.L returned -0.14%/yr vs -1.75%/yr for 0GGH.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITPG.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for 0GGH.L.
Performance
ITPG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ITPG.L is traded in GBP, while 0GGH.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 0GGH.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITPG.L achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than 0GGH.L's -3.12% return.
ITPG.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.14%
- 10Y*
- —
0GGH.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -2.67%
- YTD
- -3.12%
- 1Y
- -0.95%
- 3Y*
- 1.76%
- 5Y*
- -1.75%
- 10Y*
- —
ITPG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITPG.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF | 0.91% | 6.20% | 1.89% | 2.58% | -13.77% | 6.17% | 10.05% | 6.89% | -1.16% |
0GGH.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | -3.12% | 7.99% | -3.15% | 2.27% | -8.58% | -9.33% | 9.94% | -0.40% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITPG.L and 0GGH.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018 | 0.28 |
The correlation between ITPG.L and 0GGH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.40 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITPG.L vs. 0GGH.L — Risk / Return Rank
ITPG.L
0GGH.L
ITPG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF (ITPG.L) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITPG.L | 0GGH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.96 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | -0.25 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | -0.61 | +5.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITPG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITPG.L drawdown since its inception was -16.78%, smaller than the maximum 0GGH.L drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITPG.L and 0GGH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITPG.L | 0GGH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.78% | -22.95% | +6.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.85% | -4.98% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.74% | -4.98% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.78% | -22.95% | +6.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | -16.49% | +12.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -11.93% | +6.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 2.06% | -1.30% |
Volatility
ITPG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF (ITPG.L) is 1.00%, while iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) has a volatility of 1.39%. This indicates that ITPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0GGH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITPG.L | 0GGH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 1.39% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | 3.75% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 5.05% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 24.42% | -18.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 21.54% | -15.18% |
ITPG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITPG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than 0GGH.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ITPG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Dividend Comparison
ITPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, while 0GGH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0GGH.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITPG.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF | 4.66% | 4.56% | 4.62% | 1.50% | 1.24% | 1.09% | 2.03% | 2.79% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITPG.L and 0GGH.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 0GGH.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
0GGH.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for ITPG.L.
ITPG.L tracks iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF, while 0GGH.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ITPG.L and 0.10% for 0GGH.L.
Find the right allocation for ITPG.L and 0GGH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer