CLMP.L vs. NATO.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (CLMP.L) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L).
CLMP.L and NATO.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CLMP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Dec 3, 2020. NATO.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the EQM Future of Defence Index. It was launched on Jul 4, 2023. Both CLMP.L and NATO.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CLMP.L vs. NATO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLMP.L vs. NATO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMP.L HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF | -1.13% | 17.77% | -15.12% | -5.22% |
NATO.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating | 4.02% | 43.80% | 34.30% | 16.26% |
Different Trading Currencies
CLMP.L is traded in GBp, while NATO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NATO.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLMP.L achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than NATO.L's 4.02% return.
CLMP.L
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -9.46%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 27.54%
- 3Y*
- -2.62%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
NATO.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- 4.02%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 27.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLMP.L vs. NATO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLMP.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NATO.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CLMP.L vs. NATO.L — Risk / Return Rank
CLMP.L
NATO.L
CLMP.L vs. NATO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (CLMP.L) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLMP.L | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | 1.30 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.87 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.24 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 2.48 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | 6.22 | -4.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLMP.L | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 1.30 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 1.32 | -1.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLMP.L and NATO.L is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CLMP.L vs. NATO.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLMP.L nor NATO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CLMP.L vs. NATO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLMP.L drawdown since its inception was -48.75%, which is greater than NATO.L's maximum drawdown of -21.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMP.L and NATO.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLMP.L | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.75% | -21.84% | -26.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.66% | -12.79% | -16.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.39% | -6.04% | -22.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.88% | -2.45% | -21.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.76% | 4.68% | +12.08% |
Volatility
CLMP.L vs. NATO.L - Volatility Comparison
HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (CLMP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) at 6.44%. This indicates that CLMP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NATO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLMP.L | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 6.44% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.50% | 15.03% | +28.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.95% | 21.15% | +25.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.86% | 27.25% | +7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.43% | 27.25% | +7.18% |