PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITEB.L vs. GLTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITEB.L vs. GLTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Italy Govt Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITEB.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ITEB.L is traded in GBP, while GLTA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GLTA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITEB.L achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than GLTA.L's -1.08% return.


ITEB.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.92%
6M
-0.22%
YTD
0.50%
1Y
2.68%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
10Y*

GLTA.L

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.13%
6M
-1.91%
YTD
-1.08%
1Y
2.32%
3Y*
2.27%
5Y*
-5.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITEB.L vs. GLTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ITEB.L
iShares Italy Govt Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.50%5.10%6.13%10.70%0.86%
GLTA.L
Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc
-1.08%4.99%-4.18%3.52%3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ITEB.L and GLTA.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022

0.69

The correlation between ITEB.L and GLTA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITEB.L vs. GLTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITEB.L
ITEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ITEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ITEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GLTA.L
GLTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GLTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITEB.L vs. GLTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Italy Govt Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITEB.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITEB.LGLTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.07

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

0.41

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

0.99

+1.23

ITEB.L vs. GLTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITEB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the GLTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITEB.L and GLTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITEB.L vs. GLTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITEB.L drawdown since its inception was -5.97%, smaller than the maximum GLTA.L drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEB.L and GLTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITEB.LGLTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-36.99%

+31.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-5.70%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.03%

-7.70%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-28.27%

+26.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-19.21%

+17.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

2.34%

-1.05%

Volatility

ITEB.L vs. GLTA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Italy Govt Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITEB.L) is 1.12%, while Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc (GLTA.L) has a volatility of 1.81%. This indicates that ITEB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITEB.LGLTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

1.81%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.19%

5.29%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.81%

6.39%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.19%

10.55%

-4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.19%

10.24%

-4.05%

ITEB.L vs. GLTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITEB.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GLTA.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITEB.L vs. GLTA.L - Dividend Comparison

ITEB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while GLTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
GLTA.L
Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITEB.L
iShares Italy Govt Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.87%2.81%2.58%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITEB.L and GLTA.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLTA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLTA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ITEB.L.

ITEB.L tracks Bloomberg Italy Treasury Bond Index, while GLTA.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ITEB.L and 0.06% for GLTA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITEB.L and GLTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer