ITDI vs. ITDB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ITDI (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF) and ITDB (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF) are both Target Retirement Date funds from iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ITDI returned 29.13% vs 16.43% for ITDB. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITDI charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ITDB.

Performance

ITDI vs. ITDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF (ITDI) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDI achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly higher than ITDB's 6.50% return.

ITDI

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 12.54%
• 6M: 13.37%
• 1Y: 29.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ITDB

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 6.50%
• 6M: 6.87%
• 1Y: 16.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDI vs. ITDB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ITDI Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF	12.54%	21.90%	16.73%	12.83%
ITDB Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF	6.50%	14.58%	9.65%	11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDI and ITDB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023	0.93

The correlation between ITDI and ITDB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITDI vs. ITDB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ITDI	ITDB
Technology	26.8%	26.0%
Financial Services	16.1%	14.9%
Industrials	11.9%	12.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	8.9%
Healthcare	8.3%	7.6%
Communication Services	8.1%	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	4.6%
Basic Materials	4.3%	3.9%
Energy	4.3%	4.6%
Real Estate	3.5%	5.4%
Utilities	2.6%	3.8%

Return for Risk

ITDI vs. ITDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDI

ITDI Risk / Return Rank: 69
ITDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
ITDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
ITDI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ITDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ITDI Martin Ratio Rank: 72

ITDB

ITDB Risk / Return Rank: 70
ITDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
ITDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ITDB Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ITDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ITDB Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDI vs. ITDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF (ITDI) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ITDI	ITDB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.29	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.26	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.43	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	2.91	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.41	12.83	+0.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ITDI vs. ITDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDI Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the ITDB Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDI and ITDB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ITDI	ITDB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.29	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.76	1.94	-0.18

Drawdowns

ITDI vs. ITDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDI drawdown since its inception was -16.31%, which is greater than ITDB's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDI and ITDB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITDI	ITDB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.31%	-8.41%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.60%	-5.66%	-3.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.31%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-0.94%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	1.28%	+0.90%

Volatility

ITDI vs. ITDB - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF (ITDI) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) at 2.45%. This indicates that ITDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITDI	ITDB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	2.45%	+1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.30%	5.90%	+4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.81%	7.23%	+5.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.48%	8.60%	+5.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.48%	8.60%	+5.88%

ITDI vs. ITDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDI has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than ITDB's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ITDI vs. ITDB - Dividend Comparison

ITDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than ITDB's 1.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ITDB Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF	1.92%	2.05%	1.96%	0.62%
ITDI Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF	1.45%	1.63%	1.68%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITDI and ITDB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, ITDI and ITDB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ITDI or ITDB?

ITDI has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to ITDB (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDI dropped -16.31% vs ITDB's -8.41%.

Which ETF is better, ITDI or ITDB?

On 1-year performance, ITDI leads with 29.13% vs 16.43% for ITDB. On fees, ITDB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ITDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ITDI or ITDB?

Over the 1-year period, ITDI has performed better with a 29.13% return vs 16.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITDI or ITDB?

ITDB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for ITDI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITDI or ITDB?

ITDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.45% for ITDI.

What is the main difference between ITDI and ITDB?

Their fees differ too: 0.11% for ITDI and 0.09% for ITDB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ITDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.