PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDF vs. FDEWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDF vs. FDEWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund Investor Class (FDEWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDF achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than FDEWX's 11.87% return.


ITDF

1D
-1.59%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.22%
1Y
24.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDEWX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.79%
YTD
11.87%
6M
11.27%
1Y
26.79%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDF vs. FDEWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ITDF
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF
9.93%20.86%16.15%12.92%
FDEWX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund Investor Class
11.87%21.39%14.14%11.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDF and FDEWX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.99

The correlation between ITDF and FDEWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDF vs. FDEWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDF
ITDF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ITDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDF Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FDEWX
FDEWX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDEWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDF vs. FDEWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund Investor Class (FDEWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITDFFDEWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

3.08

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

13.26

-1.69

ITDF vs. FDEWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDF Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the FDEWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDF and FDEWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITDF vs. FDEWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDF drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum FDEWX drawdown of -30.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDF and FDEWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDFFDEWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-30.69%

+15.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-9.07%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-0.66%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-4.22%

+2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.10%

+0.04%

Volatility

ITDF vs. FDEWX - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund Investor Class (FDEWX) have volatilities of 4.95% and 5.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDFFDEWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

5.06%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

10.39%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

12.43%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.02%

14.52%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.02%

15.23%

-1.21%

ITDF vs. FDEWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDF has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEWX's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITDF vs. FDEWX - Dividend Comparison

ITDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than FDEWX's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDEWX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund Investor Class
1.69%1.97%1.98%1.92%2.24%1.89%1.85%10.83%2.36%1.93%2.42%2.31%
ITDF
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF
1.50%1.65%1.55%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, ITDF and FDEWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDEWX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to ITDF (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDF dropped -15.67% vs FDEWX's -30.69%.

FDEWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDF and FDEWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer