ITDD vs. ITDC
ITDD (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF) and ITDC (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF) are both Target Retirement Date funds from iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ITDD returned 20.04% vs 17.50% for ITDC. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ITDD charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ITDC.
Performance
ITDD vs. ITDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITDD achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly higher than ITDC's 6.85% return.
ITDD
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 20.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITDC
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 6.85%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- 1Y
- 17.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITDD vs. ITDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ITDD Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF | 8.11% | 17.66% | 13.08% | 12.87% |
ITDC Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF | 6.85% | 16.10% | 11.41% | 12.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITDD and ITDC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | 0.98 |
The correlation between ITDD and ITDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITDD vs. ITDC — Risk / Return Rank
ITDD
ITDC
ITDD vs. ITDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF (ITDD) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITDD | ITDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 2.65 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.44 | 11.56 | -0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITDD vs. ITDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITDD drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, which is greater than ITDC's maximum drawdown of -10.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDD and ITDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITDD | ITDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.46% | -10.39% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | -6.63% | -0.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -1.42% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -1.08% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 1.52% | +0.24% |
Volatility
ITDD vs. ITDC - Volatility Comparison
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF (ITDD) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC) at 3.52%. This indicates that ITDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITDD | ITDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 3.52% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.62% | 7.54% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.31% | 9.07% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.56% | 10.15% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.56% | 10.15% | +1.41% |
ITDD vs. ITDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITDD has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than ITDC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ITDD vs. ITDC - Dividend Comparison
ITDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than ITDC's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ITDC Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF | 1.89% | 2.02% | 1.93% | 0.84% |
ITDD Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF | 1.69% | 1.82% | 1.56% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, ITDD and ITDC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ITDD has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to ITDC (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDD dropped -12.46% vs ITDC's -10.39%.
On 1-year performance, ITDD leads with 20.04% vs 17.50% for ITDC. On fees, ITDC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, ITDC has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ITDD has performed better with a 20.04% return vs 17.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITDC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for ITDD.
ITDC has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.69% for ITDD.
Their fees differ too: 0.11% for ITDD and 0.10% for ITDC.
ITDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITDD and ITDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer