ITDB vs. IVV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ITDB (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITDB is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. ITDB is actively managed, while IVV is passively managed. Over the past year, ITDB returned 16.69% vs 28.00% for IVV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITDB charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.

Performance

ITDB vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDB achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return.

ITDB

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 2.47%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 6M: 6.66%
• 1Y: 16.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IVV

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: 10.85%
• 6M: 10.87%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 22.43%
• 5Y*: 13.88%
• 10Y*: 15.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDB vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ITDB Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF	6.33%	14.58%	9.65%	11.73%
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	10.85%	17.85%	24.93%	11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDB and IVV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023	0.87

The correlation between ITDB and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITDB vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ITDB	IVV
Technology	26.0%	35.6%
Financial Services	14.9%	11.8%
Industrials	12.3%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	10.1%
Communication Services	8.0%	11.2%
Healthcare	7.6%	8.5%
Real Estate	5.4%	1.9%
Energy	4.6%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.9%
Basic Materials	3.9%	1.8%
Utilities	3.8%	2.4%

Return for Risk

ITDB vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDB

ITDB Risk / Return Rank: 68
ITDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ITDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ITDB Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ITDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ITDB Martin Ratio Rank: 70

IVV

IVV Risk / Return Rank: 70
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 70
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDB vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ITDB	IVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.39	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	3.25	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.43	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	3.17	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.03	14.71	-1.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ITDB vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDB Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDB and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ITDB	IVV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.39	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.93	0.45	+1.48

Drawdowns

ITDB vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDB drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDB and IVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITDB	IVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.41%	-55.25%	+46.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.66%	-8.89%	+3.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.53%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-0.76%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.94%	-10.78%	+9.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.28%	1.91%	-0.63%

Volatility

ITDB vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) is 2.51%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that ITDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITDB	IVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.51%	2.87%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.90%	8.90%	-3.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.23%	11.80%	-4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.61%	16.88%	-8.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.61%	18.05%	-9.44%

ITDB vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ITDB vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

ITDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ITDB Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF	1.93%	2.05%	1.96%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	1.06%	1.17%	1.30%	1.44%	1.66%	1.20%	1.57%	1.85%	2.21%	1.75%	2.01%	2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITDB and IVV in my portfolio?

ITDB and IVV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ITDB or IVV?

IVV has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to ITDB (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDB dropped -8.41% vs IVV's -55.25%.

Which ETF is better, ITDB or IVV?

On 1-year performance, IVV leads with 28.00% vs 16.69% for ITDB. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ITDB or IVV?

Over the 1-year period, IVV has performed better with a 28.00% return vs 16.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITDB or IVV?

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ITDB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITDB or IVV?

ITDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

What is the main difference between ITDB and IVV?

ITDB is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while IVV is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ITDB and 0.03% for IVV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.