PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISX5.L vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISX5.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISX5.L is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISX5.L achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.51% return.


ISX5.L

1D
0.93%
1M
0.69%
YTD
6.38%
6M
8.51%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*

XLKQ.L

1D
-2.18%
1M
10.88%
YTD
23.51%
6M
22.58%
1Y
51.80%
3Y*
36.62%
5Y*
25.27%
10Y*
26.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISX5.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISX5.L
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.38%37.35%4.89%27.49%-14.22%13.65%7.93%24.55%-15.55%27.04%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
23.51%24.49%41.63%59.85%-29.07%35.05%42.15%50.99%-4.30%34.14%

Correlation

The correlation between ISX5.L and XLKQ.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2016

0.49

The correlation between ISX5.L and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISX5.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISX5.L
XLKQ.L

Financial Services

25.0%
7.3%

Industrials

21.4%
1.5%

Technology

17.0%
91.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Energy

5.3%

-

Healthcare

5.3%

-

Utilities

4.7%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%

-

Communication Services

2.5%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

ISX5.L
25.0%
XLKQ.L
7.3%

Industrials

ISX5.L
21.4%
XLKQ.L
1.5%

Technology

ISX5.L
17.0%
XLKQ.L
91.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ISX5.L
9.8%
XLKQ.L

-

Consumer Defensive

ISX5.L
5.6%
XLKQ.L

-

Energy

ISX5.L
5.3%
XLKQ.L

-

Healthcare

ISX5.L
5.3%
XLKQ.L

-

Utilities

ISX5.L
4.7%
XLKQ.L

-

Basic Materials

ISX5.L
3.5%
XLKQ.L

-

Communication Services

ISX5.L
2.5%
XLKQ.L

-

Real Estate

ISX5.L

-

XLKQ.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISX5.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISX5.L
ISX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ISX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ISX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISX5.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISX5.LXLKQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.44

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

3.14

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

9.57

-4.96

ISX5.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISX5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISX5.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISX5.LXLKQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

2.69

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

1.09

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

1.17

-0.51

Drawdowns

ISX5.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISX5.L drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISX5.L and XLKQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISX5.LXLKQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.94%

-35.00%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.92%

-16.81%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-26.96%

+11.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.86%

-35.00%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-3.14%

+2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-5.75%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

5.53%

-1.69%

Volatility

ISX5.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) is 6.08%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that ISX5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISX5.LXLKQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

6.83%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

14.91%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

19.61%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

23.32%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.94%

22.22%

+0.72%

ISX5.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISX5.L has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISX5.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISX5.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ISX5.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISX5.L is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISX5.L is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

ISX5.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. ISX5.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for ISX5.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISX5.L and XLKQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer