ISX5.L vs. XESC.L
ISX5.L (iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF) and XESC.L (Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, from iShares and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISX5.L returned 10.52%/yr vs 10.49%/yr for XESC.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISX5.L charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XESC.L.
Performance
ISX5.L vs. XESC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISX5.L is traded in USD, while XESC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XESC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ISX5.L having a 6.38% return and XESC.L slightly lower at 6.26%.
ISX5.L
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 17.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- —
XESC.L
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 17.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
ISX5.L vs. XESC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISX5.L iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 6.38% | 37.35% | 4.89% | 27.49% | -14.22% | 13.65% | 7.93% | 24.55% | -15.55% | 27.04% |
XESC.L Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 6.26% | 37.83% | 4.34% | 26.39% | -13.73% | 14.46% | 6.31% | 26.61% | -15.74% | 25.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISX5.L and XESC.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2016 | 0.81 |
The correlation between ISX5.L and XESC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISX5.L vs. XESC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISX5.L
XESC.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
ISX5.L
XESC.L
Industrials
ISX5.L
XESC.L
Technology
ISX5.L
XESC.L
Consumer Cyclical
ISX5.L
XESC.L
Consumer Defensive
ISX5.L
XESC.L
Energy
ISX5.L
XESC.L
Healthcare
ISX5.L
XESC.L
Utilities
ISX5.L
XESC.L
Basic Materials
ISX5.L
XESC.L
Communication Services
ISX5.L
XESC.L
Real Estate
ISX5.L
-
XESC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISX5.L vs. XESC.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISX5.L
XESC.L
ISX5.L vs. XESC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISX5.L | XESC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 4.60 | +0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISX5.L | XESC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.03 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.51 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.40 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
ISX5.L vs. XESC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISX5.L drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, roughly equal to the maximum XESC.L drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISX5.L and XESC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISX5.L | XESC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.94% | -39.41% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -13.27% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -15.71% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.86% | -35.12% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -1.13% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.53% | -10.50% | +2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 3.88% | -0.04% |
Volatility
ISX5.L vs. XESC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.L) at 5.60%. This indicates that ISX5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XESC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISX5.L | XESC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 5.60% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.01% | 14.05% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.11% | 17.26% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 20.56% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 20.43% | +2.51% |
ISX5.L vs. XESC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISX5.L has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XESC.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISX5.L vs. XESC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISX5.L nor XESC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ISX5.L and XESC.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ISX5.L is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISX5.L is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XESC.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for ISX5.L and 0.09% for XESC.L.
Find the right allocation for ISX5.L and XESC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer