ISX5.L vs. ANXG.L
ISX5.L (iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF) and ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both exchange-traded funds - ISX5.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while ANXG.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISX5.L returned 12.48%/yr vs 17.51%/yr for ANXG.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISX5.L charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXG.L.
Performance
ISX5.L vs. ANXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISX5.L is traded in USD, while ANXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ANXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISX5.L achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly lower than ANXG.L's 12.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ISX5.L has underperformed ANXG.L with an annualized return of 12.48%, while ANXG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.51% annualized return.
ISX5.L
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- 6M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 17.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
ANXG.L
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- 6M
- 12.00%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 24.23%
- 3Y*
- 22.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 17.51%
ISX5.L vs. ANXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISX5.L iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 7.09% | 37.35% | 4.59% | 26.91% | -13.63% | 13.94% | 6.81% | 25.61% | 1.58% | 9.70% |
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 12.52% | 20.12% | 26.56% | 55.81% | -33.39% | 28.67% | 47.76% | 39.59% | -26.44% | 45.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISX5.L and ANXG.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2010 | 0.53 |
The correlation between ISX5.L and ANXG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISX5.L vs. ANXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISX5.L
ANXG.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
ISX5.L
ANXG.L
Industrials
ISX5.L
ANXG.L
Technology
ISX5.L
ANXG.L
Consumer Cyclical
ISX5.L
ANXG.L
Consumer Defensive
ISX5.L
ANXG.L
Healthcare
ISX5.L
ANXG.L
Utilities
ISX5.L
ANXG.L
Energy
ISX5.L
ANXG.L
Basic Materials
ISX5.L
ANXG.L
Communication Services
ISX5.L
ANXG.L
Real Estate
ISX5.L
-
ANXG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISX5.L vs. ANXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISX5.L
ANXG.L
ISX5.L vs. ANXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISX5.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.25 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 2.19 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 7.40 | -2.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISX5.L vs. ANXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISX5.L drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, roughly equal to the maximum ANXG.L drawdown of -37.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISX5.L and ANXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISX5.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.62% | -37.77% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -11.02% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -23.10% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.86% | -35.18% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.62% | -37.77% | -0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -6.65% | +3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -8.66% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 3.27% | +0.55% |
Volatility
ISX5.L vs. ANXG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) is 4.87%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that ISX5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISX5.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 6.55% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.65% | 13.53% | +2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 17.21% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 20.74% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 22.37% | -0.66% |
ISX5.L vs. ANXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISX5.L has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ANXG.L's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISX5.L vs. ANXG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISX5.L nor ANXG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISX5.L and ANXG.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISX5.L is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISX5.L is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for ANXG.L.
ISX5.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ANXG.L is Nasdaq-100. ISX5.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for ISX5.L and 0.13% for ANXG.L.
Find the right allocation for ISX5.L and ANXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer