ISUS.L vs. EMAD.L
ISUS.L (iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and EMAD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ISUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Islamic Gross Index in USD (NET), while EMAD.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Asia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISUS.L returned 11.08%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for EMAD.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISUS.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EMAD.L.
Performance
ISUS.L vs. EMAD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISUS.L is traded in GBp, while EMAD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMAD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISUS.L achieves a 15.18% return, which is significantly lower than EMAD.L's 19.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ISUS.L has outperformed EMAD.L with an annualized return of 11.08%, while EMAD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.
ISUS.L
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -4.93%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- YTD
- 15.18%
- 1Y
- 26.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
EMAD.L
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -12.23%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 19.05%
- 1Y
- 31.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
ISUS.L vs. EMAD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISUS.L iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 15.18% | 8.35% | 11.17% | 18.94% | -1.34% | 31.21% | 3.24% | 16.79% | -0.56% | 3.81% |
EMAD.L State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 19.05% | 22.71% | 13.06% | 1.22% | -12.44% | -5.26% | 24.47% | 12.33% | -9.33% | 30.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISUS.L and EMAD.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2011 | 0.54 |
The correlation between ISUS.L and EMAD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (5 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISUS.L vs. EMAD.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISUS.L
EMAD.L
ISUS.L vs. EMAD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISUS.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISUS.L | EMAD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 2.13 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.15 | 7.15 | +4.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISUS.L vs. EMAD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISUS.L drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than EMAD.L's maximum drawdown of -34.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISUS.L and EMAD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISUS.L | EMAD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.74% | -34.94% | -25.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | -14.73% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.99% | -18.40% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.99% | -26.80% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.48% | -34.94% | +10.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.75% | -14.73% | +6.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -11.76% | -2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 4.40% | -2.19% |
Volatility
ISUS.L vs. EMAD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISUS.L) is 6.15%, while State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L) has a volatility of 9.33%. This indicates that ISUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMAD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISUS.L | EMAD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 9.33% | -3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 20.13% | -8.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.03% | 22.59% | -8.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 19.21% | -4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 19.52% | -3.93% |
ISUS.L vs. EMAD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISUS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAD.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISUS.L vs. EMAD.L - Dividend Comparison
ISUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while EMAD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMAD.L State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISUS.L iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.66% | 0.75% | 0.89% | 1.13% | 1.53% | 1.00% | 1.50% | 1.41% | 1.45% | 1.43% | 1.23% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISUS.L and EMAD.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISUS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISUS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMAD.L.
ISUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EMAD.L is Asia Pacific Equities. ISUS.L tracks MSCI US Islamic Gross Index in USD (NET), while EMAD.L tracks MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Asia Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISUS.L and 0.55% for EMAD.L.
Find the right allocation for ISUS.L and EMAD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer