ISTM vs. IVV
ISTM (iShares Strategic Metals ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISTM is a Metals fund tracking the ICE Strategic Re-Industrialization Metals Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ISTM returned 58.68% vs 28.00% for IVV. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISTM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
ISTM vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISTM achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return.
ISTM
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 13.15%
- 6M
- 24.67%
- 1Y
- 58.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
ISTM vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ISTM iShares Strategic Metals ETF | 13.15% | 54.07% | 6.95% | 2.69% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.85% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 11.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISTM and IVV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023 | 0.29 |
The correlation between ISTM and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISTM vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
ISTM
IVV
ISTM vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Strategic Metals ETF (ISTM) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISTM | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 2.39 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.20 | 3.25 | -1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 3.17 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.65 | 14.71 | -8.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISTM | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 2.39 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.45 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
ISTM vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISTM drawdown since its inception was -22.20%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISTM and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISTM | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.20% | -55.25% | +33.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.20% | -8.89% | -13.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.03% | -0.76% | -10.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -10.78% | +4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.85% | 1.91% | +6.94% |
Volatility
ISTM vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Strategic Metals ETF (ISTM) has a higher volatility of 8.76% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that ISTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISTM | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.76% | 2.87% | +5.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.06% | 8.90% | +19.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.67% | 11.80% | +18.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.11% | 16.88% | +7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.11% | 18.05% | +6.06% |
ISTM vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISTM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISTM vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
ISTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.06%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISTM iShares Strategic Metals ETF | 13.06% | 14.78% | 29.62% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISTM and IVV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISTM has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISTM dropped -22.20% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 1-year performance, ISTM leads with 58.68% vs 28.00% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ISTM has performed better with a 58.68% return vs 28.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ISTM.
ISTM has the higher dividend yield at 13.06%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.
ISTM is categorized as Metals, while IVV is S&P 500. ISTM tracks ICE Strategic Re-Industrialization Metals Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ISTM and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISTM and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer