PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISTB vs. MYCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISTB vs. MYCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) and State Street My2027 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISTB achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than MYCG's 1.33% return.


ISTB

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.71%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
2.27%

MYCG

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.74%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISTB vs. MYCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
0.49%6.36%-0.70%
MYCG
State Street My2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.33%5.85%-0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ISTB and MYCG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.81

The correlation between ISTB and MYCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISTB vs. MYCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISTB
ISTB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISTB Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ISTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

MYCG
MYCG Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MYCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCG Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCG Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISTB vs. MYCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) and State Street My2027 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISTBMYCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

2.23

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

10.68

-7.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

50.67

-37.95

ISTB vs. MYCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is lower than the MYCG Sharpe Ratio of 4.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISTB and MYCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISTBMYCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

4.73

-2.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

2.75

-1.91

Drawdowns

ISTB vs. MYCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISTB drawdown since its inception was -9.34%, which is greater than MYCG's maximum drawdown of -0.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISTB and MYCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISTBMYCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-0.86%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.26%

-0.45%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.01%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-0.14%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

0.09%

+0.24%

Volatility

ISTB vs. MYCG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) has a higher volatility of 0.54% compared to State Street My2027 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCG) at 0.16%. This indicates that ISTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MYCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISTBMYCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

0.16%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.28%

0.52%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77%

1.01%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

1.50%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.51%

1.50%

+1.01%

ISTB vs. MYCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MYCG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISTB vs. MYCG - Dividend Comparison

ISTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, which matches MYCG's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
4.25%4.12%3.83%2.97%2.01%1.69%2.20%2.75%2.57%2.06%1.90%1.58%
MYCG
State Street My2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.29%4.28%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISTB and MYCG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISTB has higher volatility (0.54%) compared to MYCG (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISTB dropped -9.34% vs MYCG's -0.86%.

On 1-year performance, MYCG leads with 4.75% vs 4.19% for ISTB. On fees, ISTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, MYCG has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MYCG has performed better with a 4.75% return vs 4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MYCG.

MYCG has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 4.25% for ISTB.

ISTB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while MYCG is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISTB and 0.15% for MYCG.

MYCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.73 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISTB and MYCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer